Well basically that, what do you think..is it right to kill 1 or 2 innocents people to save the lives of hundreds more..??
here's a scenario-- A Carrier of an airborne strain of Ebola is about to board a plane where he will share the same stale air with scores of strangers. Do you allow him to risk infecting fellow passengers or do you kill him if that is the only way to prevent him from getting on the flight?
...oohh and..would this be put here in world event, politics, religion, etc...i wasnt really sure..
On to the second part. If you had to kill some one could you do it with by pressing a button? Only a gun? Only a knife? With a piano wire? With your bare hands?
Obviously I listed them in the order that would put you further away from having to see him die to closer.
i guess that instead of killing the guy why dont you just get him away from other people .
yeah but it'd just be easier to kill him but even then the disease could spread from a dead body so you'd have to burn it afterwards i suppose
If you had to kill some one could you do it with by pressing a button? Only a gun? Only a knife? With a piano wire? With your bare hands?
i've never really murdered someone in cold blood so there's no definitive way to answer this question i mean killing a person is not like in the movies its not psychologically easy to deal with
