ForumsWEPRFox news out on top

122 15424
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

It looks like CNN has to find a better way to attract more veiwers.
I honistly didn't think CNN told the whole truth so I always wachted FOX NEWS .And I guess alot of other people are doing the same thing.

http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/mixed-media/2009/03/20/cnns-march-ratings-so-far-more-lamb-than-lion

  • 122 Replies
TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

Yes I know, neither did I.

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Yes I know, neither did I.

You sort of did. Here is what you said:
Yes, that's true, but I think Fox does it to a lesser extent, oh wait, I know!


So. . .you declared that Fox takes things out of context less. Yet provided no evidence. So, evidence or that statement is void. >:P
TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

So. . .you declared that Fox takes things out of context less. Yet provided no evidence. So, evidence or that statement is void. >:P


Yes but I never said how much less did I?
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Yes but I never said how much less did I?

Moot. No matter what, you would need evidence for any less taken-out-of-context stuff.
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

Moot. No matter what, you would need evidence for any less taken-out-of-context stuff.


W8 what are you talking about ??? That really doesn't make sense...

By the way what news station do you wacht?
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

the problem is, you've asked for evidence when you yourself have provided none on your accusations, thisisnotanalt

..Hipocrit

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

the problem is, you've asked for evidence when you yourself have provided none on your accusations, thisisnotanalt

..Hipocrit

1st. What accusations?
2nd. If you're going to insult someone with a big word, then spell it right.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

you should strive in news for what is closest to the truth

No, they tell conservatives what they want to hear and nothing but what they want to hear. 

In actual debate, people like Bill O'Reilly wouldn't stand a chance--he actually sometimes cuts the mic off when people present a point that he doesn't want people to hear.


judging someone off grammar is what i'd expect a person as desparate as you would
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

judging someone off grammar is what i'd expect a person as desparate as you would

What is that supposed to mean? I wasn't judging you off of grammar, I just thought it was ironic in a way. Also, how am I desperate?
----------------
you should strive in news for what is closest to the truth

Think about it. If you hear "Obummer is trying to destroy America again" instead of "President Obama says that a further stimulus may be needed" will there not be misconceptions? You would think he is doing something, but you don't know what. That isn't news.
-------------------
No, they tell conservatives what they want to hear and nothing but what they want to hear.

If you hate Obama, would you rather hear a conservative news station call him "Obama" or "Obummer?"
---------------
In actual debate, people like Bill O'Reilly wouldn't stand a chance--he actually sometimes cuts the mic off when people present a point that he doesn't want people to hear.

Saw it happen. Forget the episode, but I saw him debating with a guest. There was one point when his mouth kept moving, but there was no mic so you couldn't hear what he was saying.
----------
@Graham, not only was the grammar thing off-topic, but it was kind of arbitrary to say. Also, actually back up what you say. . . .
jonnypants23
offline
jonnypants23
1,353 posts
Farmer

If you hate Obama, would you rather hear a conservative news station call him "Obama" or "Obummer?"


I've never heared somone call Obama that -_-

You would think he is doing something, but you don't know what. That isn't news.


Maybe if you got off your couch and listened to the radio (the only voice for freedom) you would know that half the guys obama picked don't even know how to pay their taxes . You would know that he wants to give money to people who do not want to work , and don't feel like working. Also you would know that were in the biggest debt ever!!!!
Were never going to pay this hunk of money off , NEVER.

And and its all thxs to MR. Obama!! YAY!!!!!
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

If you hate Obama, would you rather hear a conservative news station call him "Obama" or "Obummer?"

that is a spin off the question, i didn't ask for evidence on what they call obama... and it's a joke...lighten up

Also, actually back up what you say. . . .

i saw the past presidents mentioned on it aswell

i realized how demo/libers see things, they don't look at what's said, they look at how it is said

and your so-called evidence can be denied, as i can just reflect what you said as my evidence
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

Think about it.  If you hear "Obummer is trying to destroy America again" instead of "President Obama says that a further stimulus may be needed" will there not be misconceptions?

it's to give a little excitement and interest
would you rather read "Aliens are coming!!!" or "there may have been a possibility of life on mars"
ones not completely true but you get more interested


i don't want this to turn into an obama thread, but man do i got alotto dirt on him
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

that is a spin off the question, i didn't ask for evidence on what they call obama... and it's a joke...lighten up

I was providing evidence for an earlier statement. . .that reply was completely incoherent.
----------------
And and its all thxs to MR. Obama!! YAY!!!!!

Did Obama build up the trillions we have in debt now? No. He contributed, but saying that it's all thanks to Obama is a huge exaggeration. . . .
------------
i saw the past presidents mentioned on it aswell

Then that's your evidence.
-------------
i realized how demo/libers see things, they don't look at what's said, they look at how it is said

That is a huge generalization. . .you can't say that all democrats/liberals do things like that from your small observation. . .at least accurately.
-----------
and your so-called evidence can be denied,

Then do so, if it's so easy.
----------
as i can just reflect what you said as my evidence

How? I look at what is said, and I'm not a liberal. . . .
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

but man do i got alotto dirt on him

I love it when people make fun of the president. . .as long as it doesn't go too far, it's funny.
-----------
it's to give a little excitement and interest
would you rather read "Aliens are coming!!!" or "there may have been a possibility of life on mars"
ones not completely true but you get more interested

I'm talking about a purely news standpoint, not an interest one.
-----------
Also, how dare you ninja me! >:'(
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

lighten up

"teh internetz is srs biznis."
~Strop
-------------
There is bias in all news, yet Fox is a different animal. They do a lot of their biased, conservative stuff for entertainment, yet still call themselves a serious news channel. My favorite part is the little Fox logo on the bottom-left of the screen that rotates all crazily. 8D But that's all I really like.
Showing 91-105 of 122