ForumsWEPRMy name is BGFear and I'm here to recruit you!

42 6589
bgfear
offline
bgfear
17 posts
Nomad

For those who have watched Milk... you know that quote.
Seriously, I'm proud gay rights activist. And I really want to convince you that gays should have exactly the same rights.
If you have a question, or you believe that homosexuals should have less rights, post here. I'll answer all your thoughts.

  • 42 Replies
donosld
offline
donosld
70 posts
Nomad

Sorry for double post but...

Not if the Queen is the one with the power. Then the guy marrying her will be called a prince.
Not when it comes to Homesexuals, of course. There there is no need for a partner to the king/queen.


lol you didn't get the joke. A "queen" is a slang term for a homosexual, hence the band "Queen" which is made up of a group of homosexuals. So... he was making a joke...
Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,657 posts
Jester

lol you didn't get the joke. A "queen" is a slang term for a homosexual, hence the band "Queen" which is made up of a group of homosexuals. So... he was making a joke...

You did not get what I was explaining, did you...
Yes, I got the joke, hence the "No need for a partner for the king/queen". Not really in the making fun mood, just correcting a mistake in the use of the word king as the husband of a queen.

If this is true, than your admitting that homosexuality is a disease

Agreeing with you there. Homosexuality is often either stated as a choice or a disease. Which I find rather rude.
That would be like refering to love as insanity.
Which it is.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

I think of homosexuality as just a difference, like hair color. Because that's all it is. A differentiation. Nothing more, nothing less.

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

If this is true, than your admitting that homosexuality is a disease. Depression is caused by a hormonal imbalance and it is classified as a disease... so you're saying that homosexuals are diseased?

No. Homosexuality is of a different nature than depression. Homosexuality is just a difference, whilst depression is a dangerous imbalance. By scientific studies, it has been shown that homosexuality is caused by a difference in the ratio of various hormones in the body. Sorry if it sounded like I was saying that, because I wasn't.
fourtytwo
offline
fourtytwo
698 posts
Nomad

That would be like refering to love as insanity.
define "love" in the way that you are using it here.
I think of homosexuality as just a difference, like hair color.
You aren't defined as homosexual until you act like it. A better analogy would be, you like classical music better than rap...but, of course, that is too much towards your opinion. It would be something between my analogy and yours.
donosld
offline
donosld
70 posts
Nomad

Then AIDS is nothing more or less than a differentiation. A retrovirus inserts its own DNA into that of our t-cells, causing a point mutation that makes those with the virus "different" from those without it, their immune system doesn't work. You're using a far too broad definition of the word differentiation. Differentiations are due to point mutations that are somehow beneficial to the organism. It is easily arguable that homosexuality is not, as it deprives the individual of the natural urge to reproduce and produce offspring. If your going to say something is genetic, and then classify it as not beneficial then it has to be a disease. Personally I DON'T think its a disease, rather a combination of environmental factors that create a subliminal choice. Yes homosexuals will argue that its not a choice at the conscious level, but lacking data in genomic analysis, possibly due to few homosexuals having offspring, prevents us from saying that it is a genetically inheritable trait, and therefore completely obligatory.

Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,657 posts
Jester

define "love" in the way that you are using it here.

Being in love, falling in love. Uhm... A crush, I think it is called. Crushes are temporary insanity.

Nothing to add, just... answering.
fourtytwo
offline
fourtytwo
698 posts
Nomad

Being in love, falling in love.
huh? You are using that as a definition? That is circular if you ask me...It's like saying that the word &quotaraphrase" means "a paraphrase" (that was just a random word off the top of my head)
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Then AIDS is nothing more or less than a differentiation. A retrovirus inserts its own DNA into that of our t-cells, causing a point mutation that makes those with the virus "different" from those without it, their immune system doesn't work. You're using a far too broad definition of the word differentiation. Differentiations are due to point mutations that are somehow beneficial to the organism. It is easily arguable that homosexuality is not, as it deprives the individual of the natural urge to reproduce and produce offspring. If your going to say something is genetic, and then classify it as not beneficial then it has to be a disease. Personally I DON'T think its a disease, rather a combination of environmental factors that create a subliminal choice. Yes homosexuals will argue that its not a choice at the conscious level, but lacking data in genomic analysis, possibly due to few homosexuals having offspring, prevents us from saying that it is a genetically inheritable trait, and therefore completely obligatory.

Errrrrrrrrrr! Wrong. AIDS is named as a disease because it is directly detrimental to a person's health. Also, there is science to back up homosexuality not being a choice. So. . .support your opinion please? With actual facts?
Cenere
offline
Cenere
13,657 posts
Jester

huh? You are using that as a definition? That is circular if you ask me...It's like saying that the word &quotaraphrase" means "a paraphrase" (that was just a random word off the top of my head)

Sorry for not being English or American, I had forgotten the word, but it was still there. A crush.
Because here it is pretty much the same word for both, and I forgot how to translate it.
So ignore that part, look at the crush part, will you? Instead of ignoring the explaining part.
thelistman
offline
thelistman
1,416 posts
Shepherd

I really didn't want to put it this way cause it seems a little inappropriate, but homosexuals can't make babies.

So couples who refuse to have children are wrong to marry then?

ligaboy
offline
ligaboy
1,051 posts
Peasant

I really didn't want to put it this way cause it seems a little inappropriate, but homosexuals can't make babies


Homosexuals can always adopt a child if they truly want one.

Anyway, have you never heard of sex for pleasure?
Showing 31-42 of 42