Forums → Games → Who is better? John or ConArtists?

ConArtist works really, really, really hard on his games. Unfortunately all his games are violent, gore, zombies, demons, war and those sort of stuff. His games are enjoyable, but I like variety. So I'll go with John.

His next game is TOTALLY different from his last.
I don't know where he gets his ideas.

I'll go with John.

ConArtist.

easy choice John by far

Both are very different. John continually makes a ton of games,though i don't think he makes a lot of blockbusters like "The Last Stand" games,or "Warfare 1917". Con Artists is a lot different than John,he continually creates great games,but can't make them come that fast enough. Both are great! I don't think either are bad,but they're very different.

I like them both a lot, but I think I like John better. His games always cover original ideas, like the most recent traffic or run elephant run. They are also always enjoyable to play and have very few if any technical difficulties.

I like them both but John makes his games a little cartoon-ish, and I like that about them.

john of course............no doubt he is the best

Dang, very hard to decide.. but i would have to say John.

I think ConArtist because you can tell he obviously works really, really hard on his games.

Good job ConArtist, keep it up .

I don't see why Zophia locked one thread that compared the relative merits of one game developer vs another and left this one unlocked.

Two people can have different strengths and weaknesses that makes them both great in different areas. Similarly, there need not be just one "the best." Having many great people developing games for a site is better than having just one.

Conartist defiantly... he is amazing!

John, of course

His influence on AG is amasing.

I would have to say, based on the new game, that came out by conartists, that conartists is better. Props to them

I think its a tie. Both have fun games and both have some that I don't like.