Forums → Games → Who is better? John or ConArtists?

i like John, he has much good games...but Con Artist is not bad...

ConArtitsts, for sure. Last Stand series is awesome

I don't wanna choose... I might hurt there feeling and stop making games

ConArtists. even though they draw the games, not make them, John's games are... well very random and a tad boring. while the games with the ConArtists, like Crush The Castle, are very awesome and fun and have very good graffics.

both are good but john`s randomness are so fun.randomness rocks! while all the games from conartist are often violent(not negative).

ConArtists all the way. Conartists games are ALWAYS high quality, and fun. John's games a sometimes fun, but as for quality... well...

ConArtist is best ^^ Best quality. Like Crush the castle and last stand series

I got to say that ConArtist games are better. With Crush the Castle and Warfare 1917 ConArtist is better in my books.

John makes more games, but ConArtist spends more time on his games and produces better quality ones.

Well, i have to admit the 2 of them have great potential at games, John is the one who give's Fun to the game, ConArtist is the who give's Adventure to the Game, i think, if they combined there true potentials at making flash games, and make an RPG, i'd say ;
It would be the best, indeed.

*whispers*But i think ConArtist is better than John, there actually both good.

I don't know, THere both about the same to me.

ConArtist doing the best games ever! there 's comparison!

I'll say ConArtists!

John makes new games all the time but I think ConArtists games are better because they are just more fun than John's. I do like that John has so many games to choose from though.

ConArtists.

Both are awesome though.