In the threads about homosexual marriage all the bigots of this forum keep dodging th emost important question there is to do with this issue and that is why.
Please, only post in this thread if you are against homosexual marriage and you're argument isn't God says so or, personally I find it wrong/wierd/gross etc.
Also, the whoel voting majority thing isn't relevant because I'm not talking about specific places that either do or don't have it. But why should it be an issue that is even worthy of voting for from a specifically legal (ya know, the only one tha matters in this case) point of view
While having children is certainly a part of society, it's not the only thing people contribute
It shouldn't.
Least that's my opinion, humans should be more primitive. I think it'd overall make the world a better place. Like wolves in a pack, with better forms of food.
It shouldn't. Least that's my opinion, humans should be more primitive. I think it'd overall make the world a better place. Like wolves in a pack, with better forms of food.
Seriously?
How primitive should we be? Are the Amish taking it too far by using the wheel & engineering to build houses?
If all we did was scavenge for food & hunt and screw, that chucks modern medicine, police, the internet & the rest of our, to be frank, *awesome* lives out the window.
Least that's my opinion, humans should be more primitive. I think it'd overall make the world a better place. Like wolves in a pack, with better forms of food.
Actually, on an idealistic level I agree with you. Environmental damage and overpopulation would decrease, and natural selection would generate a stronger species. Still, in practice, I'm pretty grateful we're not more primitive.
