AGS Steam Games

Forums → WEPR → Korea

41 5555
meizinsane
offline
meizinsane
34 posts
Nomad

If the koreans launch a missle at the u.s or japan this will be a diaster and i want some opinions if you think theyll launch it keep it or launch at u.s or japan or anything else reply plz

  • 41 Replies
TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

No, their not that stupid. Even if Kim Jong Il is insane, he's not stupid. Within an hour NK would nothing but smoldering ruins and glass.

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

you really should have put North Korea, as there 2 separate places. Korea doesnt "tecnacally" exist.

That said, the only countries with nuclear arms are (in order that they have made):

TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

That said, the only countries with nuclear arms are (in order that they have made):


You didn't post anything.
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

ach sry hit submit by mistake!

you really should have put North Korea, as there 2 separate places. Korea doesnt "tecnacally" exist.

That said, the only countries with nuclear arms are (in order that they have made):

Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT) powers
USA
Russia
UK
France
China

Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (N-NPT) powers
India
Pakistan
North Korea

Undeclared:
Israel

the second NK lauches a nuke, its over all they would have left of there magor cities would be radioactive glass. In the end, South East asia is unlivable due to tradewinds spreading the radiation, magor cites are glass, and millions of military and civillian lives are wasted.

NK would be complete idiots to lauch a nuke 'cuz in a time frame of 10-45 minutes It'd be raining nukes, and anything left of NK and surrounding countries would be destroyed by a coalition most likely led by the US

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

[quote]That said, the only countries with nuclear arms are (in order that they have made):

You didn't post anything[/quote]

yea, i kno, i hit submit by mistake.
TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

NK would be complete idiots to lauch a nuke 'cuz in a time frame of 10-45 minutes It'd be raining nukes, and anything left of NK and surrounding countries would be destroyed by a coalition most likely led by the US


Nukes are quite a bit more precise than you make it sound. Also, it wouldn't be 'raining nukes' as you say, we might launch 10 if we're really mad. NK is not a very big country but my question is, how do they get the nuclear material to make nukes? If we cut off their supplies, then their nuclear program will disappear.
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

but what about the nukes they already have? sure its only 2 or 3 at the most now, and cutting off there supplies would end there program, but all they have to do is stockpile enough fule and materials to lauch the nukes, and a blockade would have been partially useless, as it only limited, not eliminated, there nuclear program until saide nukes are launched.

TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

but what about the nukes they already have? sure its only 2 or 3 at the most now, and cutting off there supplies would end there program, but all they have to do is stockpile enough fule and materials to lauch the nukes, and a blockade would have been partially useless, as it only limited, not eliminated, there nuclear program until saide nukes are launched.


All of their nukes and missles have met only partial success, or failed completely. If they have 2 or 3, they're not a threat because they're going to keep them as a means to keep SK from invading them, as they are only in a cease fire, not a full peace treaty. But if they still get a hold of nuclear material, they can build enough to where they become a threat.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Guys. . .if you have even the smallest inkling of worry about nay of the nukes actually hitting the USA. . .then. . .just. . . .
http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/img/facepalm.jpeg

Seriously, watch Futureweapons. WE have amazing missile defense systems.

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

jeez alt, everytime i post something in a debate, you always find a falt!

lets just say i was writing on the bases that i knew everyone knew that due to starwars, interceptor missles, etc, a nuke hitting the US would be extremly hard, if not impossible, although things do have a tendency to fail...

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

jeez alt, everytime i post something in a debate, you always find a falt!


Get used to it. I post in like 90% of debate topics. I have my high post count for a reason. >

The phail of thinking that the USA is at risk of being nuked by NK forces my hand. . . .
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/54/cat_FACEPALM.jpg

Sorry Picard, your annoyance just wasn't enough. Lolcattery was necessary.
BigP08
offline
BigP08
1,455 posts
Shepherd

Alt is omnipresent. >
If you ever say something, be prepared to defend it.

Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

*digs foxhole, and pulls out a barret 50 cal., and a minigun. digs a small bunker and fills with ammo and food*

(prays that alt doesnt call in artillery)

TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

*digs foxhole, and pulls out a barret 50 cal., and a minigun. digs a small bunker and fills with ammo and food*

(prays that alt doesnt call in artillery)


Alt always calls in the artillery. Anyway, what is your opinion alt?
Maverick4
offline
Maverick4
6,800 posts
Peasant

yea alt, cuz we all kno (or at i do) that your just waiting to pick apart my argument and make me look (an feel) like an idjit

Showing 1-15 of 41