With all the news about Michael Jackson lately, I know everyone is wondering this. Do you believe that the accusations of molestation were true, or was it just the plot of a family that wanted quick cash?
I personally believe that he didn't do it. Michael never really had a childhood, so I can see why he would want to make sure that other kids could have a nice one. Yes he admitted to sleeping with them, but I believe he wanted them to feel safe. Since he had a father who was very abusive he would have never felt safe. I joke about the guy, but since his death I've learned a lot more about it and I feel bad for him.
Here's a thought to ponder... If MJ had been found guilty and been incarcerated, would he still be alive today? Pros- Constant supervision, regular medical checks, monitoring and possible weaning off the drugs he was (allegedly) on, no 50 concert tour to prepare for, regular meals and so on.. Cons- Prison lifestyle, probable solitary, appeals process and more court cases.. Maybe they'd have done him a favour with a guilty verdict?
Shouldent this topic be locked as too see hes dead and this is acually a very rude topic to bring up, if you think about it young kids play here they dont need to see this stuff.
I hate it when people say this. Although sometimes there can be very inappropriate threads, this is not the case. I see nothing offensive about it. Where are all of the adults and more mature users supposed to go if they want to talk about touchy issues? There are a lot of young kids, but they should just stay away from threads like this if they cannot handle it.
How dare you talk about this after he is dead... your so rude and retarded.
This could be considered flaming. Another thing, if it was inappropriate or crude it would have been locked. So, apparently, MODS and Admins. don't have a problem with it. With that being said, that was totally uncalled for, and if you don't like the issue at hand in this thread, why did you even bother replying? Just move on and act as if it's not there.
How dare you talk about this after he is dead... your so rude and retarded.
they are asking for an opinion on wether he was guilty or not, not saying that he was a fat ugly hobo who deserved to die. Its not being disrespectful. You are the one being rude by calling people rude and retarded for doing nothing wrong.
I think that the mods are making a mistake about not locking this thread. this discussion is a bit late to talk about, considering he is dead and there is no reason for us to discus it. And it is rude to discuss this considering maybe his family is upset about this.
I think that the mods are making a mistake about not locking this thread. this discussion is a bit late to talk about, considering he is dead and there is no reason for us to discus it. And it is rude to discuss this considering maybe his family is upset about this.
its a curiosty thing not a trial to punish him. This is going to sound very rude I don't mean it to be its just a fact. His family is going to have to deal with this kind of thing going on now. They are going to hear about how some people thought he was horrible and its a good thing he did, they will also hear about how some people thought he was good and shouldn't have died.This is one of the least offensive things they could hear about surronding his death.
[quote]Alright, so you're saying the armorgames community of average 12 year olds is smarter than a jury, trial, loads of evidence, lawyers, a lot of law and university-grads involved. Nice logic.
hey! im 13 but yea he was guilty guys dont just sleep with kids for the fun..they molest them...and he was also a pretty messed up guy :/
He should have . . . the boy described what his penis looked like and Mike had to go show authorities his penis. The boy's description matched Mike's doodler. He should have, but apparently money talks. . .
