Strangely enough the only ones that complained about my *horrible grammar are the people arguing against me. Huh odd ah?
Because we're the people who have to respond to it. Duh.
*facepalm*
Like HD said, Jesus wasn't the first to make the claim. He wasn't the last either. Anyone heard of Sabbatai Zebi? He made the claim in the 1600s - and then, people were smart enough to test him. and it turned out he was a farce. Just like Jesus most likely was.
Again, why would the Romans delete such an important target form their census? They would be more likely to consider it a victory that they would want in their census, not something to be deleted.
no because think, true it seemed like victory, but then jesus was ressurected. therefore making it total defeat and basically proving himself as the son of god. Romans didn't want this information to reach the rest of the world because people would believe in jesus' views(Once again i remind you he was considered a blasphomer)
Ok one thing for people that complain about grammar go 4uck yourselves.
@HiddenDistance
Just google "People Deleted from Roman Censuses".
Theres million of things that weren't supposed to happen according to scientists none of them explained. If you think all of that was coincedent or luck that's just naive.
Hmm strangely enough you were the only person complaining yesterday about my grammar.
Get your time period right bud.
The Roman king who sentenced Jesus Christ's death was Catholic or Christian google it.
no because think, true it seemed like victory, but then jesus was ressurected. therefore making it total defeat and basically proving himself as the son of god. Romans didn't want this information to reach the rest of the world because people would believe in jesus' views(Once again i remind you he was considered a blasphomer)
So you don't think the romans would have responded with "Holy crap, we just killed this guy, and he came back to life! Maybe he's the real deal!"
I have to say, if someone I knew was dead got out of their grave and started preaching sermons, I might be inclined to listen.
I'm friggin dying over here.. I need to lie down... or something. ttyl.
@HiddenDistance the people that I on my side about this still reads everyones posts not just the other sides post. So I think they would tell me if it's soooo horrible.
I dont think they would say Holy Crap we just killed this guy, and he came back to life.
I think they would be like "Oh 4uck we were wrong we have to cover this up. Other than agree yes I crucified the son of God now I have to tell the world. Or let the world know of it
@thisisnotanalt If you say there is a little chance of him being ressurrected I beg to differ. Because to me God could do basicly anything so I think he would choose to ressurrect his son.
@thisisnotanalt If you say there is a little chance of him being ressurrected I beg to differ. Because to me God could do basicly anything so I think he would choose to ressurrect his son.
Don't put anecdotes alongside actual events. We don't know if Jesus was ever resurrected - so don't treat it like it definitely happened if it didn't. The Bible is not enough support for that. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Patriotboy your being ridiculous with your smart ass comeback and answers. As much as i respect you defending your religion, theres an endpoint. This threads argument with you, is now pointless
Don't put anecdotes alongside actual events. We don't know if Jesus was ever resurrected - so don't treat it like it definitely happened if it didn't. The Bible is not enough support for that. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
