Who Would Win Canada Or U.S.A In A War

296	99474

offline

SportsChamp

434 posts

Nomad

Posted August 9, '09 3:59pm UTC

U.S.A for sure. How in the world would Canada stand a chance against them?

offline

1984chevy

225 posts

Nomad

Posted August 9, '09 10:24pm UTC

If Canada came with their hockey sticks we would all be screwed.

offline

SirLegendary

16,583 posts

Duke

Posted August 9, '09 10:28pm UTC

US

offline

cchsviking

13 posts

Nomad

Posted August 9, '09 10:29pm UTC

USA, but i dont have any beef with canada or anything

offline

minno

93 posts

Peasant

Posted August 10, '09 1:28am UTC

It would never happen.

Suspending disbelief, and discounting the UN attacking the aggressor, I'd have to say that the US would win. I'm too lazy to look up hard facts, but I believe that the US is a much more militarized nation. We played a much bigger part in WWII (yes, Canada did fight, but not anywhere near as much as the US (I like parenthetical statements (and nested parentheses))), and we have participated in much more military action since then.

offline

knight_34

13,822 posts

Farmer

Posted August 11, '09 1:01pm UTC

Unless the US is still hell bent on obliviating every single forester too. Then well, it's a whole new question.

That is very unlikely. The US would likely aim to cripple the country's infrastructure. So, they'd go for the cities.

offline

VoteSocialist

950 posts

Nomad

Posted August 11, '09 2:18pm UTC

This is such a stupid discussion, why do you people fantasize about war like this? Who would want the United States and Canada to go into a war? Do you think it would be that easy for the United States to win anyway? Ever hear of protesters? How about Guerrilla warfare making it hard to secure victory? You're all fascists! I can't believe this thread didn't die about a month ago. Sheeeesh.

offline

JJ52

1,150 posts

Nomad

Posted August 11, '09 10:13pm UTC

I cant believe I'm saying this, but, i agree with Vote Socialist. There is no point of this thread continuing because it has already been proven that this war will never happen. So why continue talking about such depressing things?

offline

shayneii

2,492 posts

Peasant

Posted August 12, '09 4:54am UTC

[quote=Nater]they havent been active in any wars that i know of[/quote]

Have you heard of Afghanistan? -.-

offline

Blu3sBr0s

1,287 posts

Nomad

Posted August 12, '09 4:07pm UTC

Have you heard of Afghanistan? -.-

Exactly my continuing point that carries through all threads, that Americans don't know enough about Canada. We do after all have the largest unprotected border in the world, so you think it would be different.

Oh and another reason why we would never be invaded. We have one of the few factories in the world that makes the medical isotopes necessary for many expensive medical scans to look for cancer and other diseases. When this factory was temporarily shut down as a safety precaution there was a worldwide whortage of this isotope.

yes, Canada did fight "in WWII", but not anywhere near as much as the US

Uhhhhh, what makes you think that?

1) Canadians were in on it from the START
2) Canadians were active in Campaigns in Italy, Northern Europe, the North Atlantic, and the Pacific, the invasion of Normandy, and were the main force that liberated Holland from occupation.
3)British Commonwealth Air Training Plan, we operated this in Canada because we had lots of open space, and were furthest from the action. We trained 157,000 air force personnel.
4)1.1 million Canadians participated, our population was only about 11 million. Thats 10% of our population.
5)D-Day:Of the 5 designated landing points for ships, Canada was given its own.
6)You know the word shock trooper? That was created to define the awesome bravery of a Canadian soldier.

[quote]Have you heard of Afghanistan? -.-[/quote]\r\n\r\nExactly my continuing point that carries through all threads, that Americans don't know enough about Canada.  We do after all have the largest unprotected border in the world, so you think it would be different.\r\n\r\nOh and another reason why we would never be invaded.  We have one of the few factories in the world that makes the medical isotopes necessary for many expensive medical scans to look for cancer and other diseases.  When this factory was temporarily shut down as a safety precaution there was a worldwide whortage of this isotope.\r\n\r\n[quote]yes, Canada did fight "in WWII", but not anywhere near as much as the US [/quote]\r\n\r\nUhhhhh, what makes you think that?\r\n\r\n1) Canadians were in on it from the START\r\n2) Canadians were active in Campaigns in Italy, Northern Europe, the North Atlantic, and the Pacific, the invasion of Normandy, and were the main force that liberated Holland from occupation.\r\n3)British Commonwealth Air Training Plan, we operated this in Canada because we had lots of open space, and were furthest from the action.  We trained 157,000 air force personnel.\r\n4)1.1 million Canadians participated, our population was only about 11 million.  Thats 10% of our population.\r\n5)D-Day:Of the 5 designated landing points for ships, Canada was given its own.\r\n6)You know the word shock trooper? That was created to define the awesome bravery of a Canadian soldier.

offline

Somers

1,532 posts

Nomad

Posted August 12, '09 4:54pm UTC

Canadians were active in Campaigns in Italy, Northern Europe, the North Atlantic, and the Pacific, the invasion of Normandy, and were the main force that liberated Holland from occupation.

And? Doesnt mean they participated or did any killing. Just means they were stationed there. I once asked a canadian about ww2. He said around only 100 canadians died...

British Commonwealth Air Training Plan, we operated this in Canada because we had lots of open space, and were furthest from the action. We trained 157,000 air force personnel.

The US were sending ships, supplies, and planes to england at the start of the war, and through it until we decided to join.

D-Day:Of the 5 designated landing points for ships, Canada was given its own.

America had 2 spots, england had 2, canada had 1

6)You know the word shock trooper? That was created to define the awesome bravery of a Canadian soldier.

? Shocktroops were just assault teams. I dont think canada had anything to do with the naming

[quote]Canadians were active in Campaigns in Italy, Northern Europe, the North Atlantic, and the Pacific, the invasion of Normandy, and were the main force that liberated Holland from occupation.[/quote]\r\n\r\nAnd? Doesnt mean they participated or did any killing. Just means they were stationed there. I once asked a canadian about ww2. He said around only 100 canadians died...\r\n[quote]\r\nBritish Commonwealth Air Training Plan, we operated this in Canada because we had lots of open space, and were furthest from the action.  We trained 157,000 air force personnel.[/quote]\r\n\r\nThe US were sending ships, supplies, and planes to england at the start of the war, and through it until we decided to join.\r\n\r\n[quote]D-Day:Of the 5 designated landing points for ships, Canada was given its own.\r\n[/quote]\r\n\r\nAmerica had 2 spots, england had 2, canada had 1\r\n\r\n[quote]6)You know the word shock trooper? That was created to define the awesome bravery of a Canadian soldier.[/quote]\r\n\r\n? Shocktroops were just assault teams. I dont think canada had anything to do with the naming

offline

Blu3sBr0s

1,287 posts

Nomad

Posted August 12, '09 6:09pm UTC

He said around only 100 canadians died...

Well he's an idiot. The number is 55,000.

The US were sending ships, supplies, and planes to england at the start of the war, and through it until we decided to join.

But you weren't sending pilots. Canada was the only place they could be trained without risk.

? Shocktroops were just assault teams. I dont think canada had anything to do with the naming

Most of those assault teams were Canadian.

offline

thisisnotanalt

9,824 posts

Shepherd

Posted August 12, '09 6:18pm UTC

@Blu3sBr0s:

Not only are you talking about WWII stats, when WWII was SIXTY YEARS AGO, but the stats you're listing are in ever way inferior to the US's stats back then. Canada would be crushed, and the USA prolly has a ton of those factories. And if not, we would build our own or just not destroy the factory.

You're making up reasons that wouldn't really help. . .at all. . . .

Canada has about 13 million soldiers fit for service.

The USA has about 118 million soldiers fit for service.

The USA has superior technology.

The USA has nuclear bombs.

The USA would win. Hands down.

offline

Somers

1,532 posts

Nomad

Posted August 12, '09 7:07pm UTC

Well he's an idiot. The number is 55,000.

55,000 wounded

"I...i cant go on...eh"

offline

Blu3sBr0s

1,287 posts

Nomad

Posted August 12, '09 7:17pm UTC

55,000 wounded

I was under the impression it was 55,000 wounded and 55,000 killed. The numbers were both quite close weren't they?

You're making up reasons that wouldn't really help. . .at all. . . .

Shhhhhh...don't tell anyone

The USA has nuclear bombs.

Which they can't use

The USA has about 118 million soldiers fit for service.

Which are currently occupied in two other wars.

And I still maintain that the U.S and their 118 million soldiers, isn't enough given the size of the country and hude variations in temperature and landscape.

We'll just send all our leaders to Yellowkife, bet you can't stand -40 degrees celsius and blinding snow storms!

And man, gotta realize I don't take this forum seriously at all, cause no one else will ever change their mind when proven wrong. So why should I?

"I...i cant go on...eh"

Yeah, that's what a wounded Canadian Soldier sounds like. Funny stuff. *coughsterotypingcough*

I'm here to have fun

[quote]55,000 wounded[/quote]\r\n\r\nI was under the impression it was 55,000 wounded and 55,000 killed.  The numbers were both quite close weren't they?\r\n\r\n[quote]You're making up reasons that wouldn't really help. . .at all. . . .[/quote]\r\n\r\nShhhhhh...don't tell anyone\r\n\r\n[quote]The USA has nuclear bombs.[/quote]\r\n\r\nWhich they can't use\r\n\r\n[quote]The USA has about 118 million soldiers fit for service.[/quote]\r\n\r\nWhich are currently occupied in two other wars.\r\n\r\nAnd I still maintain that the U.S and their 118 million soldiers, isn't enough given the size of the country and hude variations in temperature and landscape.\r\n\r\nWe'll just send all our leaders to Yellowkife, bet you can't stand -40 degrees celsius and blinding snow storms!\r\n\r\nAnd man, gotta realize I don't take this forum seriously at all, cause no one else will ever change their mind when proven wrong. So why should I?\r\n\r\n[quote]"I...i cant go on...eh"[/quote]\r\n\r\nYeah, that's what a wounded Canadian Soldier sounds like. Funny stuff. *coughsterotypingcough*\r\n\r\nI'm here to have fun :)

Categories

Quests

Community

Forums → WEPR → Who Would Win Canada Or U.S.A In A War