ForumsWEPRWar - No Pain, No Gain?

41 6316
ColonelAaron
offline
ColonelAaron
84 posts
Nomad

War - it has been considered man kind's worst creation. In the dark ages death was somthing of evreyday life. But now adays it is considered mutany, barbaric. What do you think of this, from games to the real battlefeild. Some video games make some people join the military of some nations. War to me is a barbaric, unhuman and much more. It is the blood baths and the loss of life. The breaking of freind from freind, the breaking of family, brother versus brother. I know there is no such thing as 'World Peace' but who who want war? Give your opinion, and what you think of warfare.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/War2.gif

  • 41 Replies
Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

the thing with revolutions is, that they have nothing to do with elections,


True. As for what he said, that he would only support a revolution going in the right direction, he would personally judge whether or not he believes it's going in the right direction.
dieath
offline
dieath
230 posts
Nomad

my judgement on right direction: if it promotes freedom and privacy, that tells alot

Xavier1
offline
Xavier1
671 posts
Nomad

War is lame especially considering that all governments lie to everybody. For that reason if I ever joined the army it would be the reserves so I couldn't leave Australian soil. I'm pretty sure fighting off a direct invasion is something I can actually support. But for the most part war sucks.

"War is young men dying and old men talking" Franklin D. Roosevelt

VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

War is the result of three of the following:

1.) Imperialism
2.) Feudalism
3.) Capitalism
4.) Fascism
5.) Theocracy
6.) Oligarchy
7.) Dictatorship
8.) Monarchy
9.) Anarchy
10.) Aristocracy
11.) Democracy
12.) International Borders

ligaboy
offline
ligaboy
1,051 posts
Peasant

War is the result of three of the following:

1.) Imperialism
2.) Feudalism
3.) Capitalism
4.) Fascism
5.) Theocracy
6.) Oligarchy
7.) Dictatorship
8.) Monarchy
9.) Anarchy
10.) Aristocracy
11.) Democracy
12.) International Borders



Then why post 12?



War is pointless, and I wish there would be no war, however I doubt that will ever happen. At least, not in my lifetime
VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

Then why post 12?


Because with international borders and atleast two others there will always be a war.
ligaboy
offline
ligaboy
1,051 posts
Peasant

Because with international borders and atleast two others there will always be a war.


Oh, sorry. I misunderstood your post.
VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

It's fine comrade. But historically that is what always happens.

IPwnU2Day
offline
IPwnU2Day
395 posts
Nomad

That's just listing all the types of government and borders. And governments of different types are generally the oens that war so that list is actually really accurate...

donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

1.) Imperialism
2.) Feudalism
3.) Capitalism
4.) Fascism
5.) Theocracy
6.) Oligarchy
7.) Dictatorship
8.) Monarchy
9.) Anarchy
10.) Aristocracy
11.) Democracy
12.) International Borders


for some reason i miss socialism and communism in this very detailed list.
is this a coincedence?
or would you like to elaborate why there cannot be war coming from a socialist or communist country?
dunadan
offline
dunadan
360 posts
Nomad

or would you like to elaborate why there cannot be war coming from a socialist or communist country?


War by communists countries??
Oh no, it can't be!!
USSR NEVER invaded afghanistan, never!
China NEVER invaded Tibet, never!
Communism is just the scapegoat of our societies, they never wanted such horrible thing as war!Look at these nice kids on staline's propaganda picture!could you imagien them as warriors?no!and these images are true!!of course!!
ColonelAaron
offline
ColonelAaron
84 posts
Nomad

Communism is just the scapegoat of our societies, they never wanted such horrible thing as war!Look at these nice kids on staline's propaganda picture!could you imagien them as warriors?no!and these images are true!!of course!!


Stalin did as they belived by his advisiors and high command. Before he did in 1953 they thought he wanted war with the Capitalist countries.
I. He declined an offer into the U.N.
II. He Started another coloation like the U.N. and obosed it
III. Here is a quote:
"When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use. " - Josef Stalin.
_____________
N. Korea invaded South Korea.
North Vehatname invaded South Vehatname.
_____________
'Proparganda' pictues.
VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

The Soviet Union never reached the "communist" phase, which is when everything is owned by society and there is no state. I would have to say that the Soviet Union was really more of a fascist nation than anything else. It put "MOTHER RUSSIA" above the ideal of socialism in almost every crisis, especially in WW II.

VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

for some reason i miss socialism and communism in this very detailed list.
is this a coincedence?
or would you like to elaborate why there cannot be war coming from a socialist or communist country?


That is because any true communist or socialist country would only go to war if attacked by imperialist countries first. And for a true communist society to exist, there can be no international borders. The USSR was socialist but it was also a dictatorship that had plenty of fascist traits.
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

he USSR was socialist but it was also a dictatorship that had plenty of fascist traits.


so socialist countries do go to war.
and the october revolution, which was made to support the spread of communism, was technically also a war.
Showing 16-30 of 41