ForumsWEPRHitler vs Stalin

310 86734
patriotboy1
offline
patriotboy1
238 posts
Nomad

(I don't think this topic was made yet).

I made this topic because people in the "Hitler vs Lenin" topic said they would have preferred this (Hitler vs Stalin).

So post what you think... I think Hitler was the better and smarter man.

http://www.noshame.org/scripts/yancey050429.htm

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=77830

  • 310 Replies
Kyouzou
offline
Kyouzou
5,061 posts
Jester

All things considered, the Monroe Doctrine did say the western hemisphere, which at it's eastern most point includes the United Kingdom, Ireland, bits of France, and a large section of Africa. The second Hitler started bombarding England, or better yet took over France, we could've intervened. Although we were a tad busy dealing with the economy or lack thereof.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

The second Hitler started bombarding England, or better yet took over France, we could've intervened.


After the War of 1812 we were worried about being attacked again. The purpose of the doctrine was to keep us out of European wars.
Kyouzou
offline
Kyouzou
5,061 posts
Jester

I realize this, 20th Century America was very isolationist. I was just using the language of the Monroe Doctrine to my advantage.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

Yeah. I know.

The only thing that took the US completely out of isolationism was the Cold War. It really set up our foreign policies/relations/ties with our allies (and enemies as well).

dumbbutdeadly2189
offline
dumbbutdeadly2189
113 posts
Nomad

Hitler was probably one of the greatest leaders of all time.
He was a magnificent speaker, but a terrible, crazy, twisted man.

sprooschicken
offline
sprooschicken
1,143 posts
Nomad

The only thing that took the US completely out of isolationism was the Cold War. It really set up our foreign policies/relations/ties with our allies (and enemies as well).


Well yes, but effectively these policies were only made to continue isolationism to a degree.
Hitler was probably one of the greatest leaders of all time.


Pre-war yes, yes he was, but what makes him actually one of the worst leaders of all time was letting Germany start another world war, and then his insane descision to appoint himself military commander even though he was terrible at it.
daleks
offline
daleks
3,766 posts
Chamberlain

Pre-war yes, yes he was, but what makes him actually one of the worst leaders of all time was letting Germany start another world war, and then his insane descision to appoint himself military commander even though he was terrible at it.


Hitler's main mistake was attacking Russia. London probably would have fallen in about a week if he had kept on attacking.
sprooschicken
offline
sprooschicken
1,143 posts
Nomad

Hitler's main mistake was attacking Russia. London probably would have fallen in about a week if he had kept on attacking.


WHAT!!?! No it wouldn't, Britain would have fallen yes, but not in a week!

It wasn't Russias' involvement in the war that saved Britain, it was Americas, even before they joined the war.
dumbbutdeadly2189
offline
dumbbutdeadly2189
113 posts
Nomad

At that time Britain had the fourth most powerful army in the world and the second most advanced.

It had been 2 months after Britain was attacked that Germany attacked Russia so no a week would not be realistic.

Kyouzou
offline
Kyouzou
5,061 posts
Jester

Attacking Russia did put a huge advantage in the favor of the Americans though, because it split Hitler's attention on two fronts, and by extension divided his army.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

Attacking Russia did put a huge advantage in the favor of the Americans though, because it split Hitler's attention on two fronts, and by extension divided his army.

I agree. He'd've been much better off by keeping them on his side.
dumbbutdeadly2189
offline
dumbbutdeadly2189
113 posts
Nomad

The battle of Normandy wouldn't have been so messy if we had used our own air force instead of the **** British.

They claimed they could hit any target given to them.
well.... they missed a pretty big target.

GoblinD
offline
GoblinD
322 posts
Nomad

It was impossible to use bombers like that for the time. Fortifications were just extremely hard to penetrate and were easily camouflaged. In fact, the battle of Normandy was made brilliantly and most of the German forces were confused into going other places instead of the beaches.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

They claimed they could hit any target given to them

That claim was because they'd developed an early form of usable radar.
Kyouzou
offline
Kyouzou
5,061 posts
Jester

Not only the difficulties that goblin listed, but they also didn't have the aptly named bunker busters that we do, do you realize how much power it takes to blast a hole through a mixture of steel and concrete? Besides the RAF helped the most by dropping paratroppers behind enemy lines, allowing us to gain a foot hold faster as we advance rather than having to be deadlocked every few miles.

Showing 211-225 of 310