I really am. Because, quite frankly, you are driving me nuts. I'm not sick of you because of what you believe in, but how freaking blind you are. This doesn't include a lot of you, but many of you are seriously becoming a blind, economically deficient set of individuals. You keep going on and on and on about how great communism and socialism are, and yet, you say capitalism is the freaking devil incarnate. You never once admit that there are flaws in the system, you never once did that. While I, myself a capitalist extremist, can honestly say that there are many flaws in the system. That leads me to believe that many, I repeat MANY, of you are far beyond extremism. You are completely beyond that point. I have yet to see some of you so much as mention the words 'flaw' and 'communism' in so much as the same post. In my personal opinion, while many of you preach open mindedness like a fanatical group of zealots, and preach atheism in the same way, you are a religious group of communists. You are nothing more than what you preach against.
The people who defend whatever they believe in so fanatically is precisely the reason I made this thread. I singled out communism because it is the most prevalent and the most aggressive, next to Christianity. If you watch any of the really good debaters on here they aren't berserk and enraged as some of you get.
So If I post in an argumentative forum that I am Communist I aint allowed to argue against someone who disagrees?
It seems like what you are saying is that communists just won't back down when someone disagrees. What's the point if they all just don't argue. They're allowed to say what they think. It's a debate forum.
You aren't exactly helping the trend of interesting threads. Instead of making an interesting thread you made a rant about something not all that interesting. Basically you just made a 'communism' thread. Why? Because people are now arguing over communism/capitalism again.
Next time ignore the communism threads from 12 year olds who barely know who even bloody created communism and make a thread with an actual point to it.
So If I post in an argumentative forum that I am Communist I aint allowed to argue against someone who disagrees?
I never said that. When you get chauvinistic that's when you annoy me.
I mean a rant has never been done before.
I have to reply to this. Do you know how many rants there are? DOZENS. Maybe more. Entire threads are completely filled with rants. And yes this section is the haven for them.
It seems like what you are saying is that communists just won't back down when someone disagrees. What's the point if they all just don't argue. They're allowed to say what they think. It's a debate forum.
God dammit. Do I need to give an example?
Jonny: Communism is beautiful. It does have flaws, but it's good.
Jimmy: Capitalism does outweigh communism for economic purposes, but communism does have a few upper hands.
That's a GOOD argument.
Jonny: I don't care what anyone says, communism is fucking perfect! Everyone who thinks otherwise is an obvious dumbass!
Jimmy: Woah! Calm down! You are way off. Capitalism is so perfect, it makes god look like an idiotic retard!
BAD argument. See my point? Those are far more common then you obviously know.
Obviously not. It is a forum for underage people who get their socks off by annoying the hell out of you. I mean do you honestly expect an incredibly well written reply from a 9 year old?
Quit making another haven for people to have another argument. I agree that this forum sucks at trying to ignore crappy threads but this thread is a habitual breeding ground for trolling. In other words the trolls won't listen and you're pretty much telling them your weaknesses. You have to show you aren't annoyed whatsoever and that we don't really care what they are. Otherwise it'll just keep on happening. They make communism threads because it's guaranteed to annoy Somebody. That's exactly what they want.
Oh n just saying I hate communism I was just giving an example.
I mean do you honestly expect an incredibly well written reply from a 9 year old?
This site isn't supposed to have 9 year olds. Proof:
This Site is offered and made available only to users thirteen (13) years of age or older. If you are not yet 13 years old or the required greater age for certain features, please discontinue using the Site immediately, or if for any reason, you do not agree with all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, please discontinue using the Site immediately because by using or attempting to use the Site, you certify that you are at least 13 years of age (or other required greater age for certain features, where applicable) and meet any other eligibility requirements of the Site.
First paragraph of the site. I would expect 13 year olds to have some amount of maturity, wouldn't you?
So making a rant about it is a way of fixing it?
Do I want to fix it? Yes, but I can't. I don't really care. I needed to get that out. If I said that directly at someone then I would be in a flame war. And anyone who doesn't offer decent debate here only reinforces my point. This isn't so I can complain or yell at anyone, this is to bring up an obvious point. Simply by telling me to stop and go away is making you a hypocrite.
First paragraph of the site. I would expect 13 year olds to have some amount of maturity, wouldn't you?
I would say, more than 9 yr olds, but most 13 year olds aren't. Not to say that they aren't just most aren't. Middle school was hell back then, that's proof enough >_>
The politics forum encourages intellectual debate, but there are people who hurt this by just trolling people with opposite opinions. That is not intellectual debate. Then again, there are adults with no maturity. Some don't, but most do.
This is why Capitalism is so important. For starters, the US has 3 sections with councils of people, and councils of people in state governments. And then we have us normies!
Where the 3 branches have the power to dismantle the other, it's only fair that all three need to have filled seats with mature adults. Too bad that's not the case. There are some instances where high teen year olds would do better in legislation.
