ForumsWEPRTerrorism and how to handle it.

46 7420
theamazingway
offline
theamazingway
41 posts
Nomad

How do we handle terrorism? Not the way we currently are. What do all of you think?

  • 46 Replies
deserteagle
offline
deserteagle
1,633 posts
Nomad

Either that or he's horrible disfigured and in tremendous pain.


It looks like he's going through circumcision.

Well, I think torturing them is the best way. Then life imprisonment.


Your a nice person. You probably caused that guys expression.
you probably like water boarding.
FloydTC
offline
FloydTC
2,906 posts
Nomad

well obama isnt doin a good job of it


thats because hes a socialist.
Lieutenut
offline
Lieutenut
1,251 posts
Nomad

Torture has VERY low success rate. Most of the time the suspects LIE just so they don't have to be tortured for a few days. And it's been proven that just questioning and treating the suspect like a human being is far more effective to get CORRECT information...

FloydTC
offline
FloydTC
2,906 posts
Nomad

And Bush was?


at least he tortured and killed them in guantanamo bay.
deserteagle
offline
deserteagle
1,633 posts
Nomad

at least he tortured and killed them in Guantanamo bay.

That's a good thing because....
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

The only way to make a face look like that is with car accidents, nuclear holocausts...or apparently lieutenut laughing...


Another way is to drop the soap in prison.


Okay I was going to ask when torture became a good thing but deserteagle kinda covers that question in his post.
Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

Well, the Afghan war was just declared unwinnable without a troop surge of 10,000-45,000. Canada is pulling out in 2011, Italy is considering a major troop reduction. And another troop surge from the U.S is looking unlikely politically, if not impossible.

Afghanistan is lost.

TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

Your a nice person. You probably caused that guys expression.
you probably like water boarding.


Hahaha! That's funny!

Waterboarding is for *coughpussiescough*. It doesn't go for enough. Anyone with a grain of will can take it, while flaying is much better at breaking them down. The point is not to receive info automatically, but to break them so they eventually talk. Also, if you keep torturing them until you actually receive the target, they have a much higher chance of giving accurate info.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Waterboarding is for *coughpussiescough*. It doesn't go for enough. Anyone with a grain of will can take it, while flaying is much better at breaking them down. The point is not to receive info automatically, but to break them so they eventually talk. Also, if you keep torturing them until you actually receive the target, they have a much higher chance of giving accurate info.


I'm truly speechless at this level of ignorance. Torture has never been an effective way to extract information. You're coming off as a despicable person to me...
deserteagle
offline
deserteagle
1,633 posts
Nomad

^ he's TLS3.

The Texan conservative around AG.

communist09
offline
communist09
259 posts
Nomad

Maybe if America hadn't made up lies and literally raped the Middle East for Oil and Regional dominance, then maybe we would not have this problem

TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

I'm truly speechless at this level of ignorance. Torture has never been an effective way to extract information. You're coming off as a despicable person to me...


Hahaha! That's me. Quite frankly, people who so much as plot to kill thousands of my American brethren (no matter how much I may dislike them or their beliefs) deserve no less. I don't care how much info we get. They will snap eventually, and only once the target has been taken care of do we stop the horrendous pain they deserve. We then put them to death in the electric chair to top it off.

The Texan conservative around AG.


I was the same way 8 months ago when I lived in Arizona XD
ComradeAaron
offline
ComradeAaron
20 posts
Nomad

we should kill them all.


Many problombs with that, you can't go around declairing war so fast,
1. The nations you invade and occupy would mostlikly kick the armies out and stop deporting oil, that would f*** up the country's economy if you removed the Middle East's oil imports.
2. The Military Personal will evrentaully abandon hope and resign/walk away from the army if warfare goes and your side is the lossing.
3. Enough with the American Facism.. (Not that America is) but stop acting like it. War is a last option.
FireflyIV
offline
FireflyIV
3,224 posts
Nomad

You cannot really win against religious guerrilla groups. They will never surrender. They believe that if they die, they will go to paradise, so why would they surrender to an invader?


Really? So the Malaya guerilla defeat at the hands of the British just, never happened. Or indeed the conquest of Afghanistan by Alexander the Great.

I have to say. That's a pretty simplistic view.

You. Don't. You can't.


I agree. Declaring war on an abstract noun was a stupid idea to begin with.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Torture works on some people very well, others not so much.

It all depends on the psychological profile of the person.

On the war . . . force won't work so well, because this is an amorphous enemy. We need to use propaganda here - turn the Muslims against the Muslim extremists. The groups won't last long if they're wildly unpopular and can't get new members.

Showing 16-30 of 46