Everyone knows IGN is in it for the money, and rates games as such. Name a game that they totally failed at reviewing, and give the rating you think it ACTUALLY earned. Example: Darkest of Days IGN score: 4/10 My score: 7/10 I give this score since I beleive the game wasn't terrible. Sure it had some flaws, but the game was solid and IGN was way too harsh in their review, mostly because their BIASED and CORRUPT. But who isn't these days right?
# Please do not criticize my review of the game. Keep those opinions to yourself, but feel free to wine all you want about IGN.
yah thats gonna be just wierd.....Saw is a pretty good series but a game......thats just stupid. So the game could either suck beyond anthing or be pretty good
Klaus, it's not about who says it. Don't profile just because of age. There are positive reviews of Darkest of Days, and they all give about the score that I did. Why I think that most major sites' reviews are wrong is: 1. They are the opinion of ONE PERSON, and it should not affect how you choose games 2. Most of the sponsors are paying to smear or support a game, and the reviewers do give scores as such
If you disagree with me screw you. I don't give a rat's ass about your opinion. I am tied to my convictions.
