ForumsWEPRWhy do people kill animals if they kill humans?

107 20553
n00bie1296
offline
n00bie1296
59 posts
Nomad

Why are we any better than any other animal on this planet?
I think it ignorant if some one kills an animal just because it kille a human.
The human race thinks that they are better than any other animal in the world.(well mostly) Besies we kill animals all the time so why cant they kill us without someone going after it and killing it.
It would be like you going and huting and you kill a deer but once you eat it more deer come an kill you.

  • 107 Replies
GamesArmor
offline
GamesArmor
890 posts
Nomad

possibleinstability is irght. We are more advanced and smarter than them, so we are better.

Alpha791
offline
Alpha791
3,896 posts
Peasant

It does make us better at many things but our own "ingenuity" has cause 99% of problems on Earth

DirtyCodingHabitz
offline
DirtyCodingHabitz
333 posts
Nomad

YOU may be a stupid animal, but I am not. The reason humanity is different is we have the concept of history, we record it and make our past known. We adapt our environment to us rather than adapting to it. We have the greatest mental capacity. And we are aware of our own existence, and not all animals can claim that.


You are my hero!
balerion07
offline
balerion07
2,837 posts
Peasant

[quote][quote]Why are we any better than any other animal on this planet?

We aren't better, we're smarter.[/quote]
The human race thinks that they are better than any other animal in the world.(well mostly)

Well, we are the most dangerous, and advanced. So yeah, we're better than them.
[/quote]

Nice contradiction there.

arent we the reason for global warming


No it happens naturally and humans cannot begin to compare to the CO2 emissions of volcanoes.

It does make us better at many things but our own "ingenuity" has cause 99% of problems on Earth


For every so called problem that you name I can name one that is not at all related to us.
Devious
offline
Devious
84 posts
Nomad

God gave animals to humans for humans to do with as they wish.

Animals do not have souls, unlike humans who do. Therefore when we kill a human it is the death of a soul bearing person, not a fleshy automaton guided by instinct.

Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

It does make us better at many things but our own "ingenuity" has cause 99% of problems on Earth


I bet you like global warming =P

Problem is I don't see it as a problem.

The earth is changing, sucks to be us. Good to be another organism. From our perspective this change might be bad but from another it might be good. There is no definitive problem with the Earth.
choazmachine
offline
choazmachine
1,044 posts
Nomad

The Earth is through a phase. It heats up, then it cools. So we maybe contributing to it somewhat but... it's also part of it's natural phases.

And Kirby, we know we kill animals, but the question was why do we kill animals if they kill humans?

Not why do we kill animals.

communist09
offline
communist09
259 posts
Nomad

It's the circle of life, cricket eats grass, lizard eats cricket, shark eats lizard, humans eat and kill everything else.

German3945
offline
German3945
996 posts
Nomad

Who lives longer?

That's a terrible gauge, because bees live much shorter lives than humans but they server an insanely important function in this world and the world as you know it would be very much altered, whereas humans have never served a function pertinent to this earth.

also, sea turtles are one of the longest living animals and serve no pertinent function.

lifespan means nothing.
German3945
offline
German3945
996 posts
Nomad

it's not the example, it's the fact that you thought lifespan means that the creature is more important, which is very false.

that was the entire point of my post, as you can see from the first and last sentences.

DirtyCodingHabitz
offline
DirtyCodingHabitz
333 posts
Nomad

It's the circle of life, cricket eats grass, lizard eats cricket, shark eats lizard, humans eat and kill everything else.


since when do sharks eat lizards? lol
Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

since when do sharks eat lizards? lol


Since Marx said so.
nonconformist
offline
nonconformist
1,101 posts
Nomad

So wait, if you are saying lifespan is useless, the first thing that came to mind was, you think that the killing of a 4 year old is no different from the killing of an old person? They all just are the same then?

No but its the fact that lifespan was kinda used in a bad way here.. If we were to designate who gets more authority based upon life span, we would have animals that couldn't take higher in the food chain... Its the fact that we as humans see animals as lesser species than us.. And the fact is that it is true. They have less brain power than most of us humans do, and most of their brain is based upon survival instinct. This survival instinct goes completely out of sinc when some animals taste blood... They want to get the taste of it again and again and again... And it ends up seriously injuring people, and possibly killing very young and some old people. We'd rather keep ourselves safe, than keep an angry ravid dog thats hungry for more human flesh... Its just common sense. And if any kind of animal had as much brain power as we did, they probably would try to kill the one human being that did it to that animal (cuz they would know he would probably strike again). But because they dont have this basic instinct it shows me that they have not evolved as far as we have, and therefore dont understand the severity of killing another... So yea they need to be put down, and it shouldn't be a big deal.

nonconformist
offline
nonconformist
1,101 posts
Nomad

couldn't take higher in the food chain

take=talk

VoteSocialist
offline
VoteSocialist
950 posts
Nomad

Humans are the future.

Showing 76-90 of 107