Why are we any better than any other animal on this planet? I think it ignorant if some one kills an animal just because it kille a human. The human race thinks that they are better than any other animal in the world.(well mostly) Besies we kill animals all the time so why cant they kill us without someone going after it and killing it. It would be like you going and huting and you kill a deer but once you eat it more deer come an kill you.
So wait, if you are saying lifespan is useless, the first thing that came to mind was, you think that the killing of a 4 year old is no different from the killing of an old person? They all just are the same then?
way to completely and purposefully take it the wrong way into some bogus technicality. I was blatantly using average lifespans on the first post of that debate.
i said, the average lifespan of the animal makes no difference as per its' value to society. you claimed that humans are better and can make more effect because we live longer, which is false. i said that lifespan means nothing (noting that bees have shorter lifespans, and the world can't be sustained without them, yet we mean nothing to the world).
then you went off on this BS. so i'll say again and more clearly:
average lifespan of the species does not mean it is more beneficial to society at all, whatsoever.
we are better because we are more intellegent then animals. we know how to use tools and hunt with guns. they are insinificent compaired to us. they can be more agressive at most times and they are are fair game to humans when it comes to hunting. we also try to save endangered animals too. this thread is obviously not a good one because it is obvious
Killing an animal when it kills a human isn't very bad. In a human society everyone looks after everyone else. If you kill a tigers children the tiger will rip your face off, same concept. It looks after it's own we look after our own. It just seems unfair because we can kill them so easily.