The beginning equation 1+1=1+1 Now equating RHS (right hand side of equation) 1+1 is the RHS =1+sqrt(1) =1+sqrt[(-1)(-1)]. I hope u kno BODMAS =1+sqrt(-1) * sqrt(-1) =1+ a * a remember my assumption =1+ (-1) =1-1 = 0 Remember I was only equation the RHS ??? Well now I am going to re-insert the now equated RHS into the original formula 1+1= RHS 1+1= 0.
F.A.QuestioN
Q- there is no such thing as sqrt(-1) A- yes that is true but it is also true that when u multipy the sqrt of a number with itself you get the number of who's sqrt was taken [ Sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) = 2 ] that rule is applied here...
Well even if I did not put the a=sqrt(-1) the rules still remain the same and that is sqrt(-1) * sqrt(-1) = -1 Which is the same as sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) = 2
Algebraic proofs pale in comparison to this - if I have 1 overwrought, over-thought algebraic equation that proves nothing except that algebra is often erroneous on one piece of paper, then I take another overwrought, over-thought algebraic equation that proves nothing except that algebra is often erroneous on another piece of paper, I will always, no matter what algebra says, 2 overwrought, over-thought algebraic equation that proves nothing except that algebra is often erroneous.
These are under the terms that a is the square root of -1
its the same kirbzy calm down
This is the same as 2+2=5 its just an equation or expression, it does not follow the actual logic that math follows. Its like an equation you use to solve certain problems
no not really. this equation is sound.
The beginning equation 1+1=1+1 Now equating RHS (right hand side of equation) 1+1 is the RHS 0=1+sqrt(1) 0=1+sqrt[(-1)(-1)]. I hope u kno BODMAS 0=1+sqrt(-1) * sqrt(-1) 0=1+ a * a remember my assumption 0=1+ (-1) 0=1-1 0= 0
you forget that 2=2 is also 0=0
because they are equal numbers, the other side of your equation is
the thing is 1+1=!+!
is 2=2
please learn math well. YOU NEED TO COMPLETE THE EQUATION YOU BK!!!!!!!!!!!
It's the same as algebra when u try proving 16263a + 723737d * 23456271m = 5 If that was a real equation with a solved already prooved answer(like in math text books) you will propably reach a point at which u will get 2+3 = 5 so if u solve it further u get 5=5. THUS PROVING THAT LHS = RHS that is what the equation is doing...it is proving LHS=RHS
