As a Right-wing Zealot, i can tell you that i often spoke openly against the man who became the first african-american president. Now that he's in office, he hasn't f*cked up the world like i thought he would, and he hasnt really done anything good for the economy/foreign policy (no matter what Nobel says, the prize was awarded to him based upon a PLAN of his that had not been implemented, and still is not)
Anyway, Let's rate good ol' Obama. Don't be immature and say shit like, "10000/10! I FREAKING LOVE OBAMA!" or "HE SUCKzz, -1/10" and please, not anything like "ChillzMaster is a stupid name" because then i'll take it personally.
For staying neutral, he deserves a neutral grade, except for gitmo, which was a bad move.
He's been handling foreign relations quite well though.
I don't really think so. He's been taking a different approach, but it's not necessarily a good one. Most of the world hates us, and by kissing their a*s 24/7 we're only showing weakness.
As far as declaring war on Fox news goes it is really quite sad that he would stoop so low. There is also the travesty of raising money to fight the treat of Palin who is called "dangerous" in emails and claims she is responsible for the term "death panel." It almost makes me think that 1/10 is too good for him.
I don't really think so. He's been taking a different approach, but it's not necessarily a good one. Most of the world hates us, and by kissing their a*s 24/7 we're only showing weakness.
Soooo . . . by being nice and diplomatic to other countries, we're showing weakness? Dude, China doesn't hate us any more, Iran doesn't hate us as much, we're now able to speak directly to Taliban individuals without them blowing our brains out. You may think it's weakness, but it's put most countries back in our good graces, and weakness is a good price to pay for that.
No, the ones there would commit genocide if they had the ability. They're just to much in the spotlight right now.
The RUF is perfectly capable of committing genocide, and they have been. Sooooo . . . yeah.
No, I'm saying to attack an organization just because they don't glorify him as their new god is low.
. . . .
Obama is attacking them because they treat him like the AntiChrist. If I was president, I'd attack them too. You would too. Politicians and famous people are allowed to start feuds with organizations that practically rl-flame them. Presidents are people, so they have the right to defend themselves from insult.
I am sure that is why Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants to kill all the Christians and Jews.
It's all posturing. Plus, I don't know what you Americans are complaining about. If you knew anything about Iranian history, you'd know it's the British they really hate.
Soooo . . . by being nice and diplomatic to other countries, we're showing weakness? Dude, China doesn't hate us any more, Iran doesn't hate us as much, we're now able to speak directly to Taliban individuals without them blowing our brains out. You may think it's weakness, but it's put most countries back in our good graces, and weakness is a good price to pay for that.
No, I don't think the Taliban wants to talk. They don't care about diplomacy, all they care about is the eradication of the western world. Ever heard of their little Jihad?
We're not in their good graces. Maybe a couple of their leaders don't hate us with a genocidal passion, but the majority of the populous and the leadership does, and they're exploiting Obama because of that.
And China obviously doesn't hate us -.- And they haven't for years. That's why they keep throwing money at us -.-
The RUF is perfectly capable of committing genocide, and they have been. Sooooo . . . yeah.
The RUF isn't in the spotlight, and they haven't been since their near annihilation in the late '90's. They aren't the threat they used to be.
Let's review Obama's accomplishments in his first year: 1. Apologized for every good thing the US did 2. Drove the national debt through the roof (shut up; you can't blame Bush for everything) 3. Basically admitted defeat for the Iraq War, and replaced it with another one 4. Decreased numbers of jobs 5. Got a nobel prize, a.k.a., presidential paperweight 6. Took all the credit for keeping us safe on 9/11, even though Bush was the one who strengthened our defenses 7. Took credit for no attacks on 9/11, but shortly after had a terrorist shooting in Texas 8. Pushing a healthcare bill that will make the national debt skyrocket EVEN MORE!! 9. Allowed tons of criminals (who cheated on their taxes) to be officials in charge of tax payments. 10. Took all the credit for everything good, blamed President Bush for everything bad.
Well you are the reason Israel even exists today. Might have a little something to do with it.
Actually no. I mean yes, we are definitely one of the key reasons, but it's not just because of that.
Now kids, gather round while I tell you Iranians hate the British!
In the early 1900s we went in there, because the Royal Navy was just starting to convert from coal to oil, therefore we wanted some of that sweet black gold. We negotiate a deal in which we set up oil pumps and take 84% of their oil revenues.
After WW1, Reza Khan takes over, rules brutally, and we support him until he decides to do business with the Germans. Big mistake. After WW2, we are de facto colonisers, but naturally the Iranians are not pleased. They elect Mossadeq, a believer in deomcracy and reform. He is extremely popular with the Iranian people. We don't have a problem with him until he decides to nationalise the oil industry in Iran. Suddenly, we complain to America that he's a dangerous commuist and must be brought down. Because it's at the height of the McCarthy era, the American secret services nod in agreement and organise a coup d'etat overthrowing the one good leader the Iranians have ever had, only to replace him with an autocratic shah. He gives us oil, we provide him with military equipment to keep him in power.
Then, once the shah is overthrown in 1979, they can finally chant 'death to Britain' in the streets of Tehran. In fact, they even have a 'death to Britain' day where union jacks are burnt etc. Looking back at the history though, I can hardly blame them.
No, I don't think the Taliban wants to talk. They don't care about diplomacy, all they care about is the eradication of the western world. Ever heard of their little Jihad?
Uh, that's Al-Queada that wants to destroy us. Sorry, but you misunderstood my post. Reread it.
WE're in the good graces of THE REST OF THE WORLD AFTER OUR FOREIGN RELATIONS WERE R**PED BY BUSH.
The RUF isn't in the spotlight, and they haven't been since their near annihilation in the late '90's. They aren't the threat they used to be.
. . . but they're still a genocidal group.
I am sure that is why Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants to kill all the Christians and Jews.
Okay, I'm getting annoyed here. The key words are 'AS MUCH.' Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh . . . . .
*facepalm*
Cite examples.
Must I? Fox launched an entire smear campaign over Obama's middle name. They launched a smear campaign based on his smoking cigarettes. A good deal of the time, Fox is awful to him and he has the right to strike back. Freedom of the press AND freedom from the press. The press isn't invincible. They should be allowed to be hit back when they launch an offensive against someone.
WE're in the good graces of THE REST OF THE WORLD AFTER OUR FOREIGN RELATIONS WERE R**PED BY BUSH.
Our relations were r**ped by just about every president with one country or another. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out. By helping one group we alienate another.
. . . but they're still a genocidal group.
Yes they are, but they don't have the entire worlds' media breathing down their neck. I haven't heard news of them in years.
