Here is something to get the brain going. It's been said that God created ALL things. Also it's been said that God is 100 precent pure/good. So God created man and it was said that because of man's sinful actions bad/evil things were created. But if God created ALL things then God created bad/evil things, not man. So by God creating bad/evil things this does not make him 100 precent pure/good.
I didn't answer Mage's question because we all know the answer:faith. And because there is proof, though any proof I say will just be argued against until we get back to square 1.
If proof can be argued then its not proof.
"Daddy, unicorns are real but my friend said they are not"
"Hun, unicorns are not real. There is no proof they are real, so it is a good idea to assume they don't exist."
"I have faith they exist and they talk to me threw a physic connection! "
"-_-"
Really? How many times do we have to go through this argument? Here's how it would happen: I would try to prove it, even though we all know that's impossible. Then you would be like "Well since you can't prove it he's not real", to which I say "You can't prove He doesn't exist". And we get no where.
"That is not proof, as it is dog poop, it has nothing to do with unicorns thus is not proof in there existence making it not proof"
You don't get it. People come into court all the time with real proof, yet the other lawyer will argue it anyway. So are you saying that even though this is real proof, it shouldn't be counted because the other lawyer argued against it?
You don't get it. People come into court all the time with real proof, yet the other lawyer will argue it anyway. So are you saying that even though this is real proof, it shouldn't be counted because the other lawyer argued against it?
I am fairly certain you do not get it, these are two forms of proof.
The one I am speaking of is
1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.
As the scientific version.
You are using
5. Law. (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.
Witch is not scientific and a different meaning altogether.
It's completely unnatural for one. God made it so new beings can only be made by the joining of a male and a female(in general). Imagine if Adam had been gay. Then none of us would be here.
It's completely unnatural for one. God made it so new beings can only be made by the joining of a male and a female(in general). Imagine if Adam had been gay. Then none of us would be here.
You didn't answer my question, and I will ad to it. If your theory was correct, then why do some creatures reproduce asexually?
