Food. It is the building block of civilization. Cancelling wars means nothing. I would embargo the nation I wouldn't like, cut off their river supply, etc. There are lots of ways to kill people, cutting off war means nothing. With food, though, we wouldn't have to fight over water and nutrition. No real disputes over land, all you need is a house. Things would cost less, and even if your the poorest loser out there at least your stomach's filled.
War brougt technological improvement for everyday life for us. Even if we are not soldier, can you live without nylon? Or kevlar? Yes but youìre living better now; and I don't even want to talk about medical science. So, food for all.
Okay, so how is this "no war" thing going to work? What if some random country wants to go to war? Who's going to stop them? The only way to permenantly remove war would be to remove the desire to go to war. But this would be infringing upon my freedom of choice. Therefore, I choose food for everyone.
But this would be infringing upon my freedom of choice
your freedom of choice, similar to any other freedom stops there where the freedom of any other person stops. our freedoms are being infringed every second of every day.
secondly this is a hypothetical discussion so lets assume we can remove wars. its unimportant how.
so even if there wouldnt be enough food on earth right now to feed everyone(but as stated above there is), i would prefer no wars, because that would give mankind the opportunity to work and concentrate all the effort on making the world a better place(which includes food for everyone) and not focusing on building and developing new weapons.
