Ok, so there are thousands and thousands and thousands of UFO sightings, there are Crop Circles, and the Bermuda Triangle is thought to have a USO under it that sinks the boats.
Are they Real?
IMO - Yes they are, there is just so much evidence, so much footage, and just makes sense. There are billions of stars and billions of galaxies, all too much just for one civilization to be out there. We are not alone. In my encounters, well i haven't had any,i kind of wish i had one, but if i did i would probably be scared as fuck and be in a state of shock for the rest of my life. But anyways my Grandpa worked for the Texas Government at Area 51 or somewhere there, and he had a picture of a UFO, and then my Mom saw it when she was younger, but he got mad at her, because the government could kill you, (or one of those Men in black) if they knew that someone without authority saw it. So she didn't show it to anybody, but she told me. And she told me that she was somewhere in Mexico and there was an Alien(s) eating birds in a tree or something, not sure if that was true..
Now USO's: This is where the Bermuda triangle is, i believe they might be UFO'S getting ships and people and they might have a base underwater or something, i really don't know, but i do know they exist.
Now there is another whacky idea that angels are aliens, which might be true, but i wouldn't know. But anyways there's so much evidence and footage and shit that it has to be true, we can't be alone! Post your thoughts on this.
Unidentified flying objects are real. If you didn't know that a stray weather balloon was a stray weather balloon then in all likelihood it's an unidentified flying object. If your intended questions was 'Are UFOs alien craft' then my answer is no. The reason? Fermi Paradox.
If you don't want to read into Fermi's Paradox it basically asks that if aliens are existent and nearby how comes we never see craft floating through space or any signs of extra-terrestrial activity? Something I like to ask is how - if there are no signs of extra-terrestrial vehicles - they found out there was life on this planet and then manage to visit it without ever being found.
USO's? That's extremely far-fetched. Not only is constructing a structure capable of withstanding the pressure under something like an ocean difficult, but there's no way it would go undetected. I think the thought that aliens cause the disappearance of ships is just hype.
Official agencies have reported - despite the fact that the disappearance of many vehicles cannot be attributed to any common cause for vehicles to mysteriously disappear - that vehicle disappearances are similar to any other bit of ocean in the world and that some cases have been falsely reported or described.
I believe aliens are real but not close on a cosmic scale and not intelligent enough to reach us or are intelligent enough to reach us but haven't bothered. There's not enough evidence supporting the existence of aliens on Earth. ALH84001 (I am getting that name from memory so it's subject to incorrectness) was a meteorite that, when looked at from under a electron microscope, allegedly bore some life. It's still a controversial matter but it signals (along with the climates of some moons in our solar system) that life may have existed eons ago.
Alien(s) eating birds in a tree or something
I doubt that all the people in the public rarely ever see anything but a strange light in the sky and a single photographer, regardless of his status in the government or any of the departments that deal with paranormal shit found a living alien eating.
But anyways my Grandpa worked for the Texas Government at Area 51
you had me up until USO. You were right at first there is wayyy too many other planets and stars for us to be the only living things in the universe, but it is a little less likely but not impossible for them to be intelligent. i do believe in aliens but i am not sure if they have ever actually landed on earth
ok out of all the googleplexions and billions of starts we know about if 1% had planets orbiting around them and 1%of that 1% had life the would over 100million planets with life but thats only one percent aleins do exist if god had made all of this univers just for us it would be smaller
* i love how i just uded both religus and sceintific pov
Are aliens real? Well probability says yes, evidence says no. I'll side with probability.
Now Enrico Fermi had it right. Aliens can be real but due to the age of our galaxy and the universe itself it is highly unlikely any life form has reached an advanced state of technology such as galactic travel.
No. My cousin showed me a video his friend sent him, of his friend's friend's friends screwing around with flairs and weather baloons. It was night, and the low, glowing objects got mistaken as UFO's. Actually ended up on CNN! lol...
I believe aliens are real but not close on a cosmic scale and not intelligent enough to reach us or are intelligent enough to reach us but haven't bothered.
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galazy lies a small unregarded yellow sun.
Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still thing digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
-The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, Douglas Adams
Actually, ships sink in the Bermuda Triangle because the methane deposits that crust the bottom of the area sometimes destabilize and release large amounts of bubbles that cause the water to lose its buoyancy.
I assume by a UFO you mean some sort of alien spacecraft. This, by definition, wouldn't really be a UFO since it would be identified, no? But that's precisely the problem. Any sort of ghost/alien/demon/whatever presence must be verified. But we can't even show these things actually exist, so how do we know what counts as evidence for them? How on earth did crop circles even become associated with extraterrestrial visitors? There might be a correlation between alien sightings and crop circle formations, but I doubt the seriousness of any such study and I severely doubt any causal link. Sure, there is likely extraterrestrial life elsewhere in the universe. But that in no way implies that it could ever communicate with us. Not only do we have to assume that life has evolved in other places to the scale it has on Earth, but we also have to disregard the physical impossibility of long distance space travel. Even if these aliens could overcome the speed of light hurdle, they would also have to find our little planet within the vast emptiness of the universe. It's 2 million light years to the nearest galaxy - that is quite a large distance to cover. Even the other side of the Milky Way is a nearly insurmountable distance. Of course here, the proponent of ET suggests things like worm holes or warp speed. But this isn't Star Trek. The physics just don't work out.
So, either the laws of physics(and really the universe itself) is VASTLY different from the way it appears to us, or alien sightings are just a bunch of garbage. Now what seems more probable?
As a side note, the Bermuda Triangle thing is a load of poo as well. It's a major shipping channel and thoroughfare for both marine and air traffic. When enough people travel a particular route, things are likely to go wrong. The Bermuda Triangle is a post-hoc theory. We could take any location with a lot of missing persons reports and crashes or whatever and just draw a triangle around it. Is this suddenly something mysterious? Of course not! Humans have a natural inclination to make sense of the world around them. We don't things being left up to chance - we want to have a valid stake in our own future. But sometimes stuff just happens to us and we can't control it or explain it except on a case-by-case basis. All this garbage is just a process of taking doubtful evidence, coming up with some theory that tries to explain the events after the fact, and then arguing for this post-hoc theory. We need to recognize the difference between scientific theorizing and wild conjecture.
