ForumsWEPRDebate-Should Animal Testing be Banned?

37 6684
danereeno
offline
danereeno
19 posts
Nomad

This was just an old debate topic i had, i just want peoples opinions(i was on the pros side)

  • 37 Replies
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

I don't really see why it should. I don't see why humans should not be allowed to do it. It's their choice and testing on animals to save humans... humans are selfish enough to not attribute any moral value to the lives of animals.

Just as animals differ from humans, humans differ from humans in immune system and all.

The white lab rat actually might have to be replaced because all the testing left something anomalous in their genes over generations, so there's no control group.

Dragonz5
offline
Dragonz5
96 posts
Nomad

To a degree. There is testing you could do. Like make different dog food recipes, get some dogs c which ones they like best. Really anything that doesn't cause the animals serious harm, or pain, or death shoud be acceptable. Except whatever animal comes into my backyard and kills all the little baby spruce trees im growing. I dont care what you do to that critter.

Austinn
offline
Austinn
278 posts
Nomad

Nope not by anymeans but i restrictions should be in place allthough im not sure what they could be besides not just pointlessly injecting them and throwing them in a cage and see what happens i guess...maybe better living conditions

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

No, doing so would be the dumbest thing since Twilight. Animal testing is nesicary to save human lives, both during the testing and the after affect, usualy in medicine. There is no real reason to ban it, so of course it should stay.

EnterOrion
offline
EnterOrion
4,220 posts
Nomad

I do not see how it is cruel. They're going to die anyway.


So you wouldn't mind if someone was going to shoot you either way and before they do that they were going to horrible torture you?

Enjoy the fire in your fingernails.

Do humans fit the category for testing?


No.

Unless they themselves were mad scientists who tested people.

Or torturers. They deserve the worst man can throw at them.

Should we test on animals? No.

Why?: Because we should have the confidence in our own products to test them on ourselves.


You know, we don't get random confidence from things that we've never used before. >.>
SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,586 posts
Duke

I think It shouldnt be because we need more options to alot of thing in the future.

Showing 31-36 of 37