ForumsWEPRThe Great Debate!

285 51700
Moegreche
offline
Moegreche
3,826 posts
Duke

There have been a lot of fantastic debates in this section of the forums, so I thought we could make things a bit more "interesting."
Here's how it works:
I will create profiles on which 2 people will debate one-on-one on a topic of their choosing. You will receive points based on 3 categories: argument strength, evidence, and refutation.
Argument strength is just that - how strong are your arguments. Logical fallacies and cogency of the argument play a strong role here (so, is the argument "correct" and does it make sense). Your spelling and grammar are important to, so either get a browser with spell-check or put your comments in Word or something that can check your spelling.
Evidence is articles or journals to which you can provide links to help support your argument. How reliable the evidence is also matters, so Wikipedia articles will not count towards evidence.
Refutation means being able to counter what your opponent is saying. If you can point out flaws in their argument or present counter-examples to their arguments then you can get points in this category.
The debate will go on until a predetermined score has been reached. The winner will have his or her best argument point merited - thus receiving 25 AP!
----
So, if you want to join, just put your name, the topic you would like to debate about, and how many points you would like to go to (I would suggest maybe 10 or 15 for right now, I'm not exactly sure how all the scoring will work out yet). Also include your stance on the topic.
Once you have this info posted, you have just given out a challenge and anyone can challenge you. If you would like to challenge someone, then post your name, their name, and the topic.
Feel free to create multiple challenges, so long as you can keep track of them all! Once two debaters have been matched, I'll post a link to the profile on which you guys will be debating.

I think that's everything, but here's an example of a challenge:

Name: Moegreche
Topic: Does God exist?
My stance: God does not exist!

If someone were to challenge me, then they would have to argue an opposing view to mine (in this case, that God does exist).
So, let the debates begin, and if anything is unclear or if I've missed anything then let me know either on this thread or on my profile.
Thanks, and happy debating!!

  • 285 Replies
DragonMistress
offline
DragonMistress
1,058 posts
Blacksmith

I agree... though Im far too weak in my debating skills (or lazy, really) to have picked up on one of these yet, Im really enjoying watching them... And having this stickied would get more people involved!

Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

Oh wow, bbyers has an awesome topic.

Unfortunately I'm more...wait...hm. I may possibly challenge this stance. I can handle any number of debates!

Also, I'm happy to adjudicate any debate that involves Moe.

whatever
offline
whatever
55 posts
Nomad

Moe I have to debate against thoadthetoad but the profile you created was already used for another debate and thoadthetoad hasn't put on an argument yet. Because of this I debate on something else as well.

Name:whatever
Topic:god
My stance:God does not excist

Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

Wait...but if I'm the one debating against Moe...then who else would adjudicate? D:

Devoidless
offline
Devoidless
3,675 posts
Jester

Haha, I would step up to the plate for that one. ^_^

I still need one for myself...hrrrm.

thunderpants
offline
thunderpants
78 posts
Nomad

i dont know what to say

ubertuna
offline
ubertuna
2,120 posts
Shepherd

I'll adjudicate for you and Moe. After I'm done with my debate with you. Devoidless, did you read the one I made about why outsourcing goes unchecked in the U.S.? Also, I might be willing to take on bbyers9113. As a matter of fact, I will take you on

Devoidless
offline
Devoidless
3,675 posts
Jester

I would be willing to go for that one, regardless of the side. That one would work for me.

I would also be willing to take someone on for "Drug, why not make them legal?"

rwtwm
offline
rwtwm
6 posts
Nomad

Devoidless, on the Drugs thing, It all depends on your stance. I have a fair few arguments up my sleeve for pro legalisation

ubertuna
offline
ubertuna
2,120 posts
Shepherd

Yayz! Teh sticky! Anyway, I'm up against bbyers9113 on capital punishment and Devoidless on outsourcing? :O 4 debates at once.
"look ma, no hands!"

killertron
offline
killertron
56 posts
Nomad

Name: killertron
Topic: Is religion bad?
My stance: religion IS bad!

ubertuna
offline
ubertuna
2,120 posts
Shepherd

Too irresistible. I accept your challenge, killertron!

chiliad_nodi
offline
chiliad_nodi
637 posts
Peasant

Topic: are video games social
Stance: 9 times out of 10 they are

Or

Topic: legal drugs
Stance: if they became illegal, nothing would change

Skipper8656568
offline
Skipper8656568
324 posts
Peasant

I will take you on the Drug stance chiliad_nodi
I think some would stop doing it
Bring it on!

whatever
offline
whatever
55 posts
Nomad

chiliad drugs are already illegal!

Showing 121-135 of 285