Meh, they could use laptops for storing MP3/MP4/miscellaneous other format files that are relevant to the things they teach. They could take the laptop home and create homework pieces on them then print them off for the student. Don't make a rebuttal without considering what you're saying.
This thread is barely doing what it's meant to do. It's all just proving that Anon is a troll of some kind. In any case, you can't prove the theory of evolution through pokemon. Yes, I believe in the theory. But there is much better proof out there then a game...
I think they just used the word evolution because they thought it sounded cool... my honest opinion. I don't think they really thought that what evolution was like.
Meh, they could use laptops for storing MP3/MP4/miscellaneous other format files that are relevant to the things they teach. They could take the laptop home and create homework pieces on them then print them off for the student. Don't make a rebuttal without considering what you're saying.
what are you talking about. do you goto school in the US? if not then you are the one who does not have any idea.
first off the US public school system would not allow teachers to have labtops in a child environment. if you can find 1 example that says otherwise. Id give props to you.
a laptop first of all would be considered a private piece of equipment, which is in turn quite possibly used for yourself.
k-grade (kindergartners) are 4 years old, first off, to successfully use a wide array of vocabulary such as this is already beyond the 5th grade level. second of all back on subtopic, teachers would probably have 1 master computer to print homework (squares of circles to color in?) it is possibly but not likely. more so they just watch movies all day and have recess. anyway personal equipment like laptops in kindergartens are frowned upon because it means the teacher could be paying more attention to their laptop rather than kids.
but yes good try to insult me. I mean if you said 8th grader or something possibly a good insult.
Probably a misconception of the concept. It's actually fairly common since at least a basic understanding of chemistry, molecular biology, and ecology are necessary to truly grasp what the theory of evolution covers. And let's not forget all of the people that think evolution explains the origins of life, which it doesn't. That is a field tackled by abiogenesis and that requires even more scientific understanding.
As for the analogy, pokemon has absolutely no bearing in and argument regarding natural evolution, as pokemon is not alive, it does not live in our ecosystem, it cannot be observed, measured, tested, and proven or disproved. It is simply a fictional concept which has no possible correlation to the physical realm.
However on a side note, pokemon do not evolve, they spontaneously mutate or morph. This is quite different.
As for the analogy, pokemon has absolutely no bearing in and argument regarding natural evolution, as pokemon is not alive, it does not live in our ecosystem, it cannot be observed, measured, tested, and proven or disproved. It is simply a fictional concept which has no possible correlation to the physical realm.
almost gave you a cookie, but yes it is an analogy to the bible. and how much fallacy it contains.
anyway it should be Pokemon ARE not alive not is not alive.
imply a fictional concept which has no possible correlation to the physical realm
seems like the bible to me mate. a concept created to fool someone.
Ano, you do realize that was an insult and not meant to be taken literally? And what vocabulary have you stated that anyone above five would consider advanced? You don't even capitalize you sentences, I am not a fan of spelling and grammar but capitalization shows you are at least attempting to follow the laws of grammar and spelling...
Evolution is real, but using a fictional thing like Pokemon shows that you know as little as a child. Witch is an insult to children. It is like me trying to prove that dinosaurs were intelligent using Barney as my main point.
And as for everyone else, it seems we must be more blunt. We must remember he forgot to take his nap today.
