it should be Pokemon ARE not alive not is not alive.
It's the internet, no need to be a grammar nazi.
And I wasn't aware that this thread suddenly became about bible bashing... you could have put a little more info about that in the OP rather than that short little blurb.
almost gave you a cookie, but yes it is an analogy to the bible. and how much fallacy it contains.
A poor analogy. The bible, and any other 'holy book' contains far more fallacies than you could ever evidence by comparison to cartoons.
it should be Pokemon ARE not alive not is not alive.
Forgive my grammar. As I am unaware exactly what pokemon are I made the assumption that they could be a singular entity, hence my usage of the singular term.
From now on if you are going to talk about something, at least have a minimal understanding of what you are talking about prior to broadcasting your ignorance to the world. The internet is the LAST place that ignorance will be tolerated, since all evidence for or against just about anything can be found with a few clicks of a button.
you just failed to read correctly and now you are flaming me? tsk tsk.
Ano, you do realize that was an insult and not meant to be taken literally? And what vocabulary have you stated that anyone above five would consider advanced? You don't even capitalize you sentences, I am not a fan of spelling and grammar but capitalization shows you are at least attempting to follow the laws of grammar and spelling...
above fifth grade
Evolution is real, but using a fictional thing like Pokemon shows that you know as little as a child. Witch is an insult to children. It is like me trying to prove that dinosaurs were intelligent using Barney as my main point.
no, it means you are targeting younger children with propaganda. thus winning.
It's the internet, no need to be a grammar nazi.
at least spell good
Forgive my grammar. As I am unaware exactly what pokemon are I made the assumption that they could be a singular entity, hence my usage of the singular term.
think of it as a bracket for a species, like kingdom (eg animal kingdom) in scientific catagorization
Above fifth grade? Nothing you have said is even at that level.
no, it means you are targeting younger children with propaganda. thus winning.
I win, thus you lose, since I am "winning"... No, it doesn't. Barney is a fictional character, I am using him to prove a failed point.
All in all, what you are saying makes less since than the Book of Mormon, witch makes even less since than the Bible, so you make pretty much no since.
Although the initial conversation began with the term kindergarten, when you asked for proof of the usage of technology, you asked for it as it pertains to a "children's evironment" which I more than adequately did.
you just failed to read correctly and now you are flaming me
Actually I read your query exactly as it was put forth. I'll post it here:
first off the US public school system would not allow teachers to have labtops in a child environment. if you can find 1 example that says otherwise. Id give props to you.
Above fifth grade? Nothing you have said is even at that level.
no, quite a few of those words are above the 5th grade level, seems like you need to go back since you dont recognize any of them.
I win, thus you lose, since I am "winning"... No, it doesn't. Barney is a fictional character, I am using him to prove a failed point.
how can you win, when nobody likes you? doesnt make any sense
All in all, what you are saying makes less since than the Book of Mormon, witch makes even less since than the Bible, so you make pretty much no since.
the book of mormon is a joke.
I also don't know what makes "since" to you since what you are saying makes no sense.
all in all you are the type of person who hopes to use your limited knowledge of the world to flame others that don't conform to your beliefs.
please start making sense or leave. just cause you learned something from searching google and from your 8th grade biology teacher doesnt mean you are some kind of genius. actually far from it. you just perpetuate things that "seem" to make sense and hope no one calls you out on it.
In response to the topic: Fictional biology cannot serve as scientific evidence. It can serve as an illustrative example, typically to simplify the concept for children or such... But it doesn't prove, it only illustrates.
Also, pokemon do not actually evolve, even though it's called evolving in the games. They go through a metamorphosis-like process.
Now, I'm locking this because of the little war you guys have been brewing.
In the future, if any of you people think you've found a troll (whether or not you have), guess what you should do. No wait, I'll tell you. IGNORE THEM. Do not respond. Report them if they're causing trouble, otherwise just ignore them.
I don't really view this as trolling, just rather pointless, more of a joke than anything else, and not of the quality threads need to have in this section. So yeah.
Although the initial conversation began with the term kindergarten, when you asked for proof of the usage of technology, you asked for it as it pertains to a "children's evironment" which I more than adequately did.
yes and the context was kindergartners. less ADD pls.
Evolution does exist. Squirtles evolved into turtles and charmanders evolved into salamadders.
thankyou
Actually I read your query exactly as it was put forth. I'll post it here:
right, which is why I had to use sarcasm to show you how annoying it is when people don't spell correctly/use grammar correctly.
