Well I guess the title says it all, I was just wondering who ya'll thought were the most active 'forumers' in this part of the AG forum. Opinions, that what this Forum is going to be, pure opinions, and yes you can say 'Me'.
I don't mean that because I started early, I just always thought he was at least in year 9. I wasn't sure about his age. Never really bothered checking o.O
They are. I haven't checked up on the Bowmaster sequel recently. Here.
I find some old merits kinda laughable, especially seeing how high the standards haven risen since. Though I do believe having good standards is proper.
With AG3, merits won't matter any longer I suppose.
However I'm fairly sure that comments went bold when they were upvoted, not merited.
Check the profiles of the moderators. Er.. Strop. You'll see that the people that win those AMW literature contests have their notification comments bolded. Merits.
They are. I haven't checked up on the Bowmaster sequel recently. Here.
I find some old merits kinda laughable, especially seeing how high the standards haven risen since. Though I do believe having good standards is proper.
With AG3, merits won't matter any longer I suppose.
However I'm fairly sure that comments went bold when they were upvoted, not merited.
Check the profiles of the moderators. Er.. Strop. You'll see that the people that win those AMW literature contests have their notification comments bolded. Merits.
I failed. Moderator/admin please delete my two previous posts.
I don't mind if the two are deleted. I believe they should be.
What's with the random Bowmaster reference?
Three sentence merit!
That was a merit worthy comment really? What about the page long reviews that used to get merits?
Most merits were pretty substantial (a good paragraph long) however I found some laughable examples of merits. Compare that with the standards today and how little often game merits are give out, you can understand why someone never has and never will pass nickcool_haha as the Merit King.