ForumsPopular Media"The Last Airbender" -Movie

60 11877
samy
offline
samy
4,871 posts
Nomad

To summarize my feelings of the movie I give you a quote heard at the end of the showing

Yeah, f**k you too Shyamalan


The movie was awful an opinion that is not only mine but nearly every major critic's and almost anyone who was a fan of the brilliant cartoon. So I give you a basic review based on two sections; a comparison of the movie to the cartoon and standalone review of the movie itself.

Compared to the Show

Cons:

1. All the protagonists in the story were white; now it's really not that big of a deal but it's annoying for any long time fan. Also the antagonists were all Asian which made the movie somewhat better for me but created some controversy of racist leanings. Also Uncle Ihro is skinny, what's up with that?

2. Aside from the casts not fitting the characters the three main actors were horrible maybe it was the boring script but honestly I wouldn't have cared if this Aang, or Katara, or Sokka died. They were all flat characters; in fact all the characters were flat (yes even in 3D) which is in sharp contrast to the show where Appa is a dynamic three dimensional character who we can relate to more than any character in the movie.

3. They pronounced the names wrong; Aang sounded like Oong (rhymes with gong), Sokka sounds like Sukka, and Ihro is pronounced Ehro (sounds like hero). They also call Aang the Ahvatar; if nothing else the mispronunciations led to running jokes in the theater.

4. Fire benders can't make their own fire; they need some sort of source.

5. The bending styles all resemble one another and none of them resemble anything close to what they were in the show.

6. The bending requires a lot more actions to cause a much simpler movement than in the show; in fact it takes five earth benders moving together to move a mid-sized rock.

7. The Fire Lord loves and cares for Zuko; well there goes half the plot.

8. Important sub-characters such as Suki and Jet are never explored which makes me wonder what could possibly be in the second movie (it's a trilogy).

9. Momo and Appa get, combined, around two minutes of screen time and the both look pretty bad. To be honest Momo may be my favorite character in the show and his non-appearance nearly ruined the movie for me on its own.

10. For some reason Aang decides that being the avatar means that crappy speeches and letting everyone live is more important than actually stopping the fire nation. So, remember the final battle from book one? It was awful; and there isn't a giant water beast just a big wave.

11. I could've cared less if they killed the moon spirit; when you can't even make the audience care if the moon dies you did something wrong.

12. Did I mention the character development was terrible? Aang's a whiny 10 year old who can't make a speech, Katara and Sokka are just boring, and you barely even catch a glimpse of the true Zuk0.

Pros:

1. Well at least Aang was still an airbender learning to bend water I suppose. The storyline is vaguely reminiscent of the TV show.

The Movie Standing Alone

1. The characters were terrible actors; Noah Ringer (Aang) was boring, shallow, and couldn't preform a monologue to save his life. In fact excepting Ihro the entire cast was just awkward.

2. The action sequences were boring after the first 30 seconds and were repeated again and again throughout the movie.

3.The dialog was stiff and boring, it didn't intrigue me in the least.

4. Without coming into the movie knowing the entire plot (thanks to the show) I have no idea how I would have known what was going on. The narration didn't really help either it basically told you what was on the screen. Rodgert Ebert actually thought the movie was set in the future; thank you plot development.

5. There are around six benders in the entire movie and while benders are fairly rare there weren't a dying breed. In fact one reviewer, mistakingly, through Katara was the last water bender.

6. During the battle scenes Aang and the group just walk right through the middle as if nothing is happening; clearly the Fire nation doesn't want the Avatar.

7. There's a fat white guy playing one of the Northern Water Tribe solider; I laugh at you Shyamalan.

Pros:

1. Aang's arrow was pretty sweet looking and the sets were as well.

2. They tried at least; they failed but they did try.

Conclusion:

It was bad, very bad. You can't put it in a positive light and die hard fans of the TV show will only be able to laugh as Aang continues to fail and fail again to live up to who he should be. At its best it will be a movie you rent during a party simply to laugh at it.


3/22

or

13.5 out of 100.
  • 60 Replies
MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

Check this lol
http://i756.photobucket.com/albums/xx210/MikuMitsuki/34115_408761094009_617724009_470853.jpg

Hahaha. I can't find the other one, but it is hilarious. I will post it on here in a sec

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

Here it is. lulz

http://i756.photobucket.com/albums/xx210/MikuMitsuki/tumblr_l4wnivi1HU1qzo1a0o1_500.png

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Twist ending: The fire lord is really zombie Bruce Willis from The Sixth Sense, and Aang is only the avatar because zombie-Willis controlled the trees to release a secret gas that turned 1 out of every 10 million airbenders into the avatar. Then, Aang dresses up in yellow and walks through the forest, coming to an interstate highway and realizing that the priests were lying to him.

TRUdog
offline
TRUdog
1,031 posts
Nomad

They pronounced the names wrong; Aang sounded like Oong (rhymes with gong), Sokka sounds like Sukka, and Ihro is pronounced Ehro (sounds like hero). They also call Aang the Ahvatar; if nothing else the mispronunciations led to running jokes in the theater.

In an interview with M.NIGHT he said he want to go with more asian sounding names, because if the show and the movie is revolving around asian culture.

4. Fire benders can't make their own fire; they need some sort of source.

In that same interview he said "Well, if all the benders are limited to there elements except fire, then why shouldn't fire be limited?" He also thought it would make things more interesting, and because fire is way to powerful anyway. He wanted to give them SOME limitations.
5. The bending styles all resemble one another and none of them resemble anything close to what they were in the show.

So what? Go cry to your mom about that.
8. Important sub-characters such as Suki and Jet are never explored which makes me wonder what could possibly be in the second movie (it's a trilogy).

Exactly, it's a trilogy. That means they are going to go way more in depth with those characters later on. And also, you can only pack so much material into one movie. They probably did not explore those characters because the movie would be to long.
10. For some reason Aang decides that being the avatar means that crappy speeches and letting everyone live is more important than actually stopping the fire nation.

Thats kinda what it was like in the show.
There's a fat white guy playing one of the Northern Water Tribe solider; I laugh at you Shyamalan.

So what? Are you racist and prejudice of fat people? That comment was just racist, prejudice, unnecessary and immature. I laugh at you.
------
Honestly, almost 3/4's of those comments you made were simply opinions.
They tried at least; they failed but they did try.

Opinion
The dialog was stiff and boring, it didn't intrigue me in the least.

Opinion
12. Did I mention the character development was terrible? Aang's a whiny 10 year old who can't make a speech, Katara and Sokka are just boring, and you barely even catch a glimpse of the true Zuk0.

Opinion
Honestly those are all your opinions. I am not even going to argue over you're opinion because there is no point. But I can say, that M.NIGHT did his best and knew FAGS like you would complain about fat white guys.
thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

Uh, Trudog, movies are rated based on opinions. There is no factual way to discern good or bad dialog, story, or acting. It' just that 92% of critics agree that it sucked, so it's safe to say that it does.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

I was going to watch it, but now, since you've given such good of a review, I won't.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Exactly, it's a trilogy. That means they are going to go way more in depth with those characters later on. And also, you can only pack so much material into one movie. They probably did not explore those characters because the movie would be to long.


A story should explore the characters in the first movie. Lord of the Rings did that and it was a smashing success.

Trudog, a review is basically a ton of opinions. Most of the things you said were as full of hot air.
MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

I suggest you step away TruDog, as soon as ALT came you shoulda reconsidered your post lol.

cenation
offline
cenation
96 posts
Nomad

was it really that bad i mean i love the cartoon but did the movie really suck that much

deadhead50
offline
deadhead50
341 posts
Nomad

i was thinking bout seeing it but now i have second thoughts = /

CommanderDude7
offline
CommanderDude7
4,689 posts
Nomad

lol MoonFairy those picks were hilarious. Too bad something great was ruined by hollwood. Again.

TRUdog
offline
TRUdog
1,031 posts
Nomad

Is Samy a critic? No. So why should he be convincing us that the movie sucked?

Trudog, a review is basically a ton of opinions. Most of the things you said were as full of hot air.

Um... did you read Samy's stuff? Obviously no. Go back and read it and THEN complain to me about 'hot air'.
A story should explore the characters in the first movie. Lord of the Rings did that and it was a smashing success.

True, and because the director didn't do that I think was a fail. But it still doesn't mean Jet or Suki won't be in books 2 or 3. And besides, I don't even think Jet is in book one... is he?
1337Player
offline
1337Player
1,766 posts
Peasant

Hey. Hey. Hey!

I watched it on Friday in 3D. From what I've heard about it before I watched it FROM THE DIRECTOR HIMSELF in Nickelodeon on this 15 minute show he said a lot of things were changed.

1. He said that he wanted the names to be changed to the original Asian pronunciations, being Asian himself.

2. He was questioning why Firebenders could make fire out of no where in the cartoon where the others had the resources. That was kind of true since Waterbenders can draw water out of the air. So he made the Firebends have to have resources also. Only skilled Firebenders can generate fire. Like General Iro.

3. He took out the Kyoshi Warriors because he loved them too much and he said, "To the Kyoshi Warriors there was too much to love, and they only had a beginning, no end." Well that's as specific as I can get.

The movie was good overall. I give it a 8/10. The action scenes were nice, and when Zuko was saving Aang from Commander Jiao, that was on eof my favorite parts.

1337Player
offline
1337Player
1,766 posts
Peasant

And, oops, I see Trudog said that stuff.

And actually I give the movie a 7/10.

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

He packed too much into it though. The characters didn't develop they way they should have. Katara is a smart compassionate person, but the actress they picked for her wasn't old enough. Sokka was an idiot, but funny. The only time they came close to that is when Oppas tail hit him and he said "Did you see that? It tried to eat me!" That was as close as it got. I think the person that played the Princess should of been Katara. Sokka had too much hair XD Toph is my favorite, so I hope they get her right if they choose to continue. Aang was too chubby and a bit short. The action was decent, and since he was purposley trying to differentiate, one could say it was good, but to the people who watched and love the cartoon, they would hate it.

Showing 16-30 of 60