ForumsWEPRWW3... Who would win?

213 51441
Sporemaniac777
offline
Sporemaniac777
1,373 posts
Nomad

The title says the most but I will repeat it. If there would be a WW3 what country would win?

  • 213 Replies
Bon243
offline
Bon243
96 posts
Nomad

no one, would al blow eachother to pieces

mdv96
offline
mdv96
1,017 posts
Nomad

lets just hope that the world will not go to war for a 3rd time shall we?

Bon243
offline
Bon243
96 posts
Nomad

yeppers

SubZero131
offline
SubZero131
598 posts
Nomad

as long as intelligent life exists there will be war. by intelligent i mean equivalent or around human intelligence of course. so people=war

freakymonkey
offline
freakymonkey
290 posts
Nomad

A. there will not be a war as long as we try to PEACEKEEP!
B.we don't know if we are using nuclear weapons(Canda wouldnt even try.
C.If nuclear weapons are used USA,RUSSIA,CUBA and other dictatorships will be blown to bits.

SubZero131
offline
SubZero131
598 posts
Nomad

If nuclear weapons are used USA,RUSSIA,CUBA and other dictatorships will be blown to bits.


are you implying the USA is a dictatorship
IgnoreMe
offline
IgnoreMe
184 posts
Nomad

I think the aliens will come from outer space for some holiday at the Earth if there are WW3 lol

killersquirrel1488
offline
killersquirrel1488
63 posts
Nomad

I read an article in Smithsonian magazine that World War III will most likely start and mainly occur in space, so if this is true, the (current) people able to fight would be the USA, Russia, and Japan. No one wins.

Avorne
offline
Avorne
3,085 posts
Nomad

Id say the person that would win would be the one to fire the nukes first.

samy
offline
samy
4,871 posts
Nomad

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

-Albert Einstein

No country would win; all would lose.

StepOnABaby
offline
StepOnABaby
583 posts
Nomad

North Vietnam has the largest military, the U.S. is the most advanced, tough decision, but the US could just nuke the hell out of everybody.
btw I like that Einstein quote.

Darkhand666
offline
Darkhand666
88 posts
Nomad

We'll technically their have been mare then just 2 WW like the American Revolution could could because both France and Britain which both controlled a large portion of the world fought.

Anyway the winner in a conventional fought WW without any nukes with the current technology would be no one because no 1st world country would be stupid enough to fight a war that size knowing in the end their country borders would remain the same just with less population and industrial power because of the number of casualties. Also no one trying to take over the world could destroy the combined crazy of the US and Russia, Russia being crazy for burning their land to weaken enemy troops and moral then unleashing a huge counter attack after the Russian winter kills hundreds of enemies. The US being crazy of course for republicans and gangs also killing off 2% of our population during our civil war.


Sorry for any grammar or spelling errors it's 12 and in really. tired.

sonicheroes95
offline
sonicheroes95
13,701 posts
Peasant

-kicks bon's ass- in a war no one ever wins, just lose less then others.

Darkhand666
offline
Darkhand666
88 posts
Nomad

in a war no one ever wins, just lose less then others.


That's how it is now before you use to gain the other persons land and resources. Which was worth it.
SosolidClaws
offline
SosolidClaws
251 posts
Nomad

Hawaii would obviously dominate all the other countries.


0h pl34$3 $3n$3 th3 $4rc4$m

Showing 16-30 of 213