It should be legal. I support gay marriage. There is nothing wrong with it and each person in these United States has the freedom to pursue happiness, and if that means legalizing gay marriage then let it be so! What if opposite sex marriage was illegal? How would we feel being left out from what everyone else is doing?
Im not a lawyer I gave two examples for how the corrent marriage system isn't fit for gay couples and it should be enough.
For darvinistic, its a scientific term for how nature explains things. Like Darvin explained things, that im not going to get into if they are right or no, I was using the term. In this case it explains why there is a certain percentage of the society that is gay. For the 6% tons of sources but it really doesn't matter if its 2%, 10% or whatever so I'm not going to wast time finding a source, hell maybe I was even a few percent off. IF you didn't understand "hard to read part" then too bad, the least you can do is try.
For duel-sexuality- yes its bisexuality in English. Here's my poor and way below average English skills in this forum.
Im not a lawyer I gave two examples for how the corrent marriage system isn't fit for gay couples and it should be enough.
What examples? The tax break for living with someone you are married too?
y. For the 6% tons of sources but it really doesn't matter if its 2%, 10% or whatever so I'm not going to wast time finding a source, hell maybe I was even a few percent off.
I cannot find one credible source that says there is a constant 6% of the population that is homosexual. The closet I found was a British survey of British people from 2008 that had 6% of those who responded say they were either homosexual or bisexual. But other surveys and studies very widely, some going as high as 46% others as low as 0.3%.
What examples? The tax break for living with someone you are married too?
tax benefits, devorse were the husbant keeps paying the wife.
I cannot find one credible source that says there is a constant 6% of the population that is homosexual. The closet I found was a British survey of British people from 2008 that had 6% of those who responded say they were either homosexual or bisexual. But other surveys and studies very widely, some going as high as 46% others as low as 0.3%.
Like I said before, the exact number doesn't matter - it exists everywhere.
That is not law, it just happens often. What I think it actually is(if its not it should be) is whoever has custody of the kids gets paid by the other.
Like I said before, the exact number doesn't matter - it exists everywhere.
That is not law, it just happens often. What I think it actually is(if its not it should be) is whoever has custody of the kids gets paid by the other.
This sounds about right. If it's a very wealthy family, the woman usually tries to screw the man for everything but in most cases it's a case of child support benefits - in the UK anyways.
So Moe makes the better point. It's not about tax fraud.
Do you know why married couples get those tax benefits?
That is not law, it just happens often. What I think it actually is(if its not it should be) is whoever has custody of the kids gets paid by the other.
Maybe in you're state it isn't a law, it is in many places in the world.
I agree with jefferysinspiration. It's supposed to help with family life, and it does. So when gay couples marry they should have the same rights in case they want to start a family.
Well, since the 30's, the government's promoted homeownership like crazy, as well. And most homes happen to contain families in them with a couple usually. So that's my guess as to why they promote it.
