Just by the title there are those of you who get steamed under the collar, after all I've just made a wave! Nobody like waves. but what I have to say is the ALL evidence for evolution is not concrete it is either true for every body (natural selection) or forged data (Ernst Haeckel's Embryo Drawings) meant to misguide the public!
Exactly, science should be repeatable and many of the tests that supposedly "rove evolution" are not repeatable or don't actually prove anything.
And secondly I've seen many of your comments on several other pages and you are so sarcastic and biting, you attack the person not the issue I will not put you down so lets keep this cordial shall we.
Exactly, science should be repeatable and many of the tests that supposedly "rove evolution" are not repeatable or don't actually prove anything.
Care to give an example?
And secondly I've seen many of your comments on several other pages and you are so sarcastic and biting, you attack the person not the issue I will not put you down so lets keep this cordial shall we.
I feel I can attack both the person and the issue.
and too XbhwkXusaX natural selection is true and it does happen the weak die and the strong survive but this process will not turn a zebra into an elephant! An elephants babies will always be elephant, maybe bigger or stronger elephants but they will always be elephants.
and too XbhwkXusaX natural selection is true and it does happen the weak die and the strong survive but this process will not turn a zebra into an elephant! An elephants babies will always be elephant, maybe bigger or stronger elephants but they will always be elephants.
I know natural selection is true but you just said there is no concrete proof for evolution. If it's true is there no concrete proof? If there's concrete proof for natural selection than there's concrete proof for evolution. You're contradicting yourself.
and too XbhwkXusaX natural selection is true and it does happen the weak die and the strong survive but this process will not turn a zebra into an elephant! An elephants babies will always be elephant, maybe bigger or stronger elephants but they will always be elephants.
It starts with small changes, such as the differences between an African and Asian elephant. Eventually useful mutations, such as maybe a more nimble nose or different size, will allow it to survive better thus pass on this trait to the next generation. Over a long period of time, boom, evolution.
314d1 what i would really like is for you to give an example of one that has been repeated over and over again in a truly scientific way that does prove evolution!
And why do you feel the need to attack the people?
and too XbhwkXusaX natural selection is true and it does happen the weak die and the strong survive but this process will not turn a zebra into an elephant! An elephants babies will always be elephant, maybe bigger or stronger elephants but they will always be elephants.
*epic facepalm*
the animal adapts to it's environment which means like it could become taller of furrier or even change into a new species by doing something like grow legs or lose legs obviously your gonna say "BUT I NEVER SAW IT HAPPEN" try and wrap your so called "brain" around this it takes millions of years to evolve and create a new species so don't expect to wake up tomorrow and see your dog is now a lizard
and too XbhwkXusaX natural selection is true and it does happen the weak die and the strong survive but this process will not turn a zebra into an elephant! An elephants babies will always be elephant, maybe bigger or stronger elephants but they will always be elephants.
This, along with your other posts in this thread, serve only to display your ignorance of what evolution is and do not bring to bear any legitimate argument for your position. Might I recommend a few excellent sources of information for you to read so that, hopefully, your future posts on the subject will be based on understanding and knowledge as opposed to the obvious ignorance you display here.
This, along with your other posts in this thread, serve only to display your ignorance of what evolution is and do not bring to bear any legitimate argument for your position. Might I recommend a few excellent sources of information for you to read so that, hopefully, your future posts on the subject will be based on understanding and knowledge as opposed to the obvious ignorance you display here.
Exactly, science should be repeatable and many of the tests that supposedly "rove evolution" are not repeatable or don't actually prove anything.
Please tell me what aspect do you no agree happens?
1. DNA is the basis of heredity 2. DNA changes of generations 3. DNA is responsible for the differences between organisms 4. The environment acts on the frequency of the changes 5. There are no physical limits to the amount of changes that can occur in DNA Evolution for Creationists: Where Do We Disagree?
Each of these points are backed up by testable repeat evidence.
ok so now an animal starts to develop wings they start out as flabby globs of skin then they start to generate bones and such and in a few million years it almost got full blow wings! but lacks the mussels to fully use them, so know the animal can not run at its full speed and can not get food and guess what it cant mate either because the females only choose the fit healthy males so the creature dies w/o breading and thats the end of wings! so tell me? how did creatures with wing evolve?
