I have to pick BK. Mcdonalds has poor quality food (for my expirence in Illinois) and the only good thing they have is there deserts. On some days they can make good food but rarely are they able. BK is so much better with better taste and quality.
In the end BK is the best and Mcdonalds I consider a complete fail compared to BK. How is Mcdonalds more famous then BK?
Here's a few answers: 1. (If I was a nutritionist) I would choose a heart attack as they both yield one 2.(Jason Voorhes) *heavy breath* ... *heavy breath* 3.(chuck Norris) HI-YA!!! *Round house kick* 4.(Creepy dorky guy) Snort, snort snort! I would pick the meal composed of the most proteins and the fewest lipids to perfectionalize my perfect Bod-AY 5.(Vegetarian) *giving a two hour lecture about how eating meat is bad and that cows poop out methane poo that causes global warming* (true story!) 6.(Bill Gates) I wouldn't spend my money at those stores, I would invest in Microsoft! 7.(Kool-aid man) O yea! XO 8. In my opinion: McDonalds is cheaper and more available, but I think I would have to pick the King. In general, the restaurants are cleaner, the food is nicer, and even though prices are a little higher I think the food is a little healthier.
Foods about the same, only thing I eat there is the desserts and the fries, so I would got to McDonald's, of course considering that experiment recently done by the artist, I doubt I'll eat something at McDonald's again.
Burger King's Tendercrisp, McDonalds's sweet tea, Rally's french fries...now THAT'S a fast food meal.
I typically have McDonalds more. I know I said tendercrisp, but that's the only thing that Burger King is good for in my opinion. McDonalds has some tasty Quarter Pounders.