Im going with Call Of Duty. I like how it is more realistic, i enjoy the maps more and the multiplayer is really good. Plus you get a mini-map and kill streaks. Off course, you can always just go to hardcore to remove the mini-map, and killstreaks you dont have ot use them. The negatives are the reatively short campaign modes and how it doesnt have a lvl creator like HALO.
HALO is too cartoony for me. You get a ridiculous amount of health on that game as well. I swear i shot a guy like 10 times, he's still alive. Like what up? Then you compare the AI's of both agmes, CoD's is better IMO.
I prefer Call Of Duty, even though the campaign mode is short - I don't like Halo's campaign since they took some characters that were in Halo 1 & 2 out. It just doesn't appeal to me anymore. I also like playing Call Of Duty online instead of playing Halo online since on Halo their weapons aren't realistic & I don't like their maps when playing online.
Halo is fine though, but when it comes to these two; I prefer Call Of Duty.
But, I do like Halo 1 $ 2 for campaign mode, 3 was alright, but wasn't the same with some characters taken out.
Think for a second, master chief vs any COD carecter, master chief always wins. Halos much better in my opinon, i mean really, its more fun to blow somone up with a scorpion tank then it is to shoot them to death with an AK-47, besides COD online doesent give drivable vielacles. So just for the veilical options in halo, halo beats call of duty.
Think for a second, master chief vs any COD carecter, master chief always wins.
Think for an hour, it's fictional. That'll never happen. I enjoy how realistic Call Of Duty is and the scenery; I never cared much for Halo, except for the first two.
its more fun to blow somone up with a scorpion tank then it is to shoot them to death with an AK-47
Requires more aiming skill on Call Of Duty while on Halo you shoot anywhere and you end up killing someone.
So just for the veilical options in halo, halo beats call of duty.
Because the vehicles ruin the game, who wants to drive around the game? Get GTA for that. These are war games, it's much more enjoyable to be on foot then in a vehicle.
The Halo storyline is pretty incredible. It's pretty darn deep. The CoD storylines are interesting as well and are also fun to play, but I think Halo wins out here.
Of course, the only one some people care about is multiplayer. In Halo, it usually takes more shots to kill, with the exception of some weapons. Call of Duty has a much wider variety of weapons, however.
The difference between Halo and Call of Duty is the shooting part of the game, the pink, meaty, core of both games. Both are excellent franchises and both have ended with their original developers (infinity ward and bungie) but will continue with new developers.
CoD is an excellent realistic shooter with massive customization and scores of unlockables. It takes around 3 bullets to kill an enemy however, and lacks a consistent supply of driveable vehicles. That may work with some people, and it does fit the setting and tone that Activision and Infinity Ward, (soon Raven and Sledgehammer will join in) have worked so hard to create over the past decade.
Halo, however, is about the skirmishes. The prolonged combat where 2-16 titans battle it out on big maps and small maps alike. While one can kill in Cod W/3 bullets, Halo's weaponry and armor effects make teh game more of a strategy shooter. A player can easily take on 3 opponents at once, as long as if all of them don't know that their shields will go down if their caught in the resultant effect of Armor lock, upon which the moment will be taken advantage of and the one sole fighter will beat all three down before he can get assassinated.
The vehicles aren't a game-breaker like CoD, no one runs from a vehicle in Halo, they charge headfirst, trying to jack it or get it to try and run over them so they can Armor Lock and destroy it "Achievement Unlocked". Grenades also seem to play a more prominent role in Halo than CoD, excluding the ever-enjoyable semtex
halo comes out just barely over CoD in the multiplayer department, and the campaign of both franchises have had their ups and downs, making them equal, and Firefight and Nazi Zombies are equally fun to play with friends.
Why are we fretting over this age-old debate when there's Battlefield 3 to get worked-up over???
Grenades also seem to play a more prominent role in Halo than CoD,
I completely agree. Every time I see somebody about to turn a corner on my radar, I throw a grenade, and they usually don't have enough time to escape before it, then I just one-shot them. Also, have you ever seen what happens to a person who is in Armor Lock? They get tons of grenades lobbed at them. I love grenades in Halo. The only thing I hate is how the Sticky is stronger than the frag.
CoD is way better it gives u more things to do on multiplayer and is overall awesome halo just seems too...............weird to me and i like how CoD is more realistic
