Fable 1 was amazing and was a challenge to beat it. Fable 2 was also amazing and was the hardest to beat. Fable 3 was not that good because you already started off royal and you didn't have to work your way up to becoming famous. It was also far to easy and way to short.
In fable 3 i got the evil ending. I then restarted and beat the game in 3 hours.. Ya, the company really made a good story. To many black and white choices
One thing I'd like Fable Fans (like me) to take onboard.
DON'T GET EVERYTHING!
Limit what you can do with your powers, don't try and get ultimus maximus on everything otherwise it will be easy.
I feel like you're EVERY class, and you can learn essentially everything - however if you limit yourself you are potentially making classes. On Fable II I would use Fiery and Ghost spells to make myself similar to a Necromancers (Pyromancer too ).
That's actually quite a good thing you could do in Fable 1, you know, since you got Assassin Rush, Ghost Swords, Summon, Multi-Arrow, Drain Life and Time Control.
Wow, that's alot, actually.
By the way, and sorry to be a pain in the woop, but can someone please tell me the spells that are available to you on Fable III? Thanks
I liked Fable 2 better than 3 because no matter how you play, you can still carry on living as you wish once the story was over. Whereas in Fable 3 (SPOILERS BELOW! PLEASE DON'T READ IF YOU HAVEN'T FINISHED FABLE 3 YET!)
If all the civillians died at the end from the creeper attack, you can't really do much...
If all the civillians died at the end from the creeper attack, you can't really do much...
It's not hard to not let that happen. Fable isn't intended to be hard, I don't think, they're just meant to give you freedom and difficulty IF YOU CHOOSE IT (as my previous post has mentioned).