We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More
| 41 | 5921 |
While Julian Assange is currently facing extradition to Sweden over alleged **** charges, debate is still raging about whether this is politically motivated, or whether this is a serious charge against the Wikileaks founder?
What are your opinions? Not only about the current case, but about Wikileaks in general? Do you think that Wikileaks is, as they say, keeping governments open? Or is Wikileaks a criminal organization? Maybe your opinion lies somewhere inbetween?
He can't be charged for publishing them, but receiving stolen property is felonious.
Helped? No, he's simply made information free again. The countries that support him do so because they support free knowledge.
There's a difference between school justice and the US justice system.
You aren't charged until you're convicted by a jury of your peers.
Iceland likes Wikileaks.
http://gigaom.com/2010/06/17/iceland-and-wikileaks-try-to-make-the-world-safe-for-secrets/
http://gigaom.com/2010/06/17/iceland-and-wikileaks-try-to-make-the-world-safe-for-secrets/
When did I ever say every country supported wikileaks?
I like how you avoided the question.
If you buy new shoes that cost $400 and you usually wear shoes that cost $50, I could claim you stole them and take you to court and I could win.
You just asked the wrong question :P
Clearly Arab nations that are largely at war with America would support wikileaks meaning, as a last resort, Assange could seek refuge there.
I also see Britian's decision not to extradite Assange to Sweden as a small show of support and, as we all know, the UK has a large influence over European politics.
He also has the support of Journalists world wide. and in addition to that he has the support of prominant American libertarian Ron Paul
Unless you can give me an example along with any legal cases showing that this would ever happen I say again, innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
If you receive or buy property that you know or have reason to believe is stolen, you have committed the crime of receiving stolen property. Knowledge that the property his stolen may be implied by the circumstances, for example, buying goods out of the trunk of an automobile or for a price that is unreasonably low. In most states, receiving stolen property is a felony if the value of the property received is more than $100 and a misdemeanor if the value is $100 or less.
Now what information is so valuable to those Arab nations?
If you receive or buy property that you know or have reason to believe is stolen, you have committed the crime of receiving stolen property.
Not very much, it's America getting ***** slapped; that's funny.
Yeah, absolutely nothing to do with the example you posted before; perhaps with Assange but elite's post deals with that.
You must be logged in to post a reply!
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More