ForumsWEPRRonald Reagan

56 15802
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

I will post what it says in my book, and I want you guys to post what you think about it.

Deregulation

As part of his promise to reduce government and "get the government off the backs of the American people," President Reagan pursued a policy of deregulation. This meant cutting the rules and regulations government agencies placed on businesses. Under President Reagan, for example, the Department of Transportation wrote new rules for automobile exhaust systems and safety measures that were easier for car manufacturers to meet.

Reaganomics

Deregulation and his court appointments showed President Reagan's commitment to a conservative view of government. It was his economic policies, however, that formed the core of the "Reagan Revolution." Reagan believed that lower taxes would allow individuals and corporations to invest in new businesses. Because a tax cut would mean less income, Reagan also called for less government spending. Supporters called Reagan's economic policy supply-side economics because it proposed to stimulate the economy by increasing the supply of goods and services. The president's critics ridiculed the policy as "Reaganomics."

In 1981 Congress lowered taxes and slashed nearly $40 billion from federal programs such as school lunches, student aid, welfare, low-income housing, and food stamps. Critics charged that these cuts hurt both the working poor and unemployed people. Supporters argued that Reaganomics would boost the economy, helping everybody in the long run.

While Reagan cut domestic programs, he pushed for sharp increases in military spending. The president declared that the Soviet threat made it necessary to build up the military.

Government Debt

With higher defense spending and lower taxes, the government spent more money than it collected in revenue. It had to borrow money to make up the difference. This borrowing increased the federal debtâ"the amount of money owed by the government. Between 1970 and 1980, the federal debt had grown from $381 to $909 billion. By 1990 the debt had jumped to $3.2 trillion.

Recession and Recovery

President Reagan's new economic policies seemed to falter when a serious recession began early in his first term. However, the economy recovered a year later and began to boom.

In 1983 the economy began a long, steady rise. Businesses expanded, and the high jobless rate of 1982 declined. Investors showed confidence in the economy with a boom in stock trading.

http://www.mhln.com/ob/assets/00083001/jpg/00083363.jpg

The federal debt continued to grow as well. In 1985 Congress tried to halt growth of the debt by passing the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. The act set a series of targets for eliminating the federal budget deficit by 1991. If Congress and the president could not agree on voluntary spending cuts, the law called for automatic spending cuts to balance the budget. The provision for automatic cuts did not apply to all areas of the budget, however, so it had limited success.


Well, what do you think?
  • 56 Replies
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

My opinion. Well he was our best president ever. A hard line conservative like myself.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

My opinion. Well he was our best president ever. A hard line conservative like myself.


Did you read what it said in the OP?
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

I don't see the point you're trying to make. Be more specific.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

I don't see the point you're trying to make. Be more specific.


Just read the OP.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

I did the read the op. It makes Ronald Reagen look like the good president he was.

Section 1: he releases restrictions on markets affected by government regulation

Section 2: He decreases taxes, increases defense spending, and cuts domestic programs.

Section 3: Federal Debt increased.

Section 4: A recession happened but went away, and Congress tried to decrease the debt.

I still don't see what you're saying.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Section 1: he releases restrictions on markets affected by government regulation

Section 2: He decreases taxes, increases defense spending, and cuts domestic programs.

Section 3: Federal Debt increased.

Section 4: A recession happened but went away, and Congress tried to decrease the debt.


Are you stupid? How is a recession and a federal debt a good thing? He slashed 40 billion dollars from the school budget, welfare, and food stamps. How the hell is that good?
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

Are you stupid? How is a recession and a federal debt a good thing? He slashed 40 billion dollars from the school budget, welfare, and food stamps. How the hell is that good?


Firstly a recession is a natural part of economic flow. There's no use blaming anyone for it. Secondly, he slashed it from the budget to increase military spending. I don't know about you, but I kind of enjoy not being Russian right now.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

at that time, having a huge military force was just natural.

though, the missed chances of that generation makes me kind of sad.

I like it to not be russian right now too. I don't like to know that if the USA builds a war with russia, europe is going to have a problem named: intercepted nukes raining from the sky. THAT was the plan.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Firstly a recession is a natural part of economic flow. There's no use blaming anyone for it. Secondly, he slashed it from the budget to increase military spending. I don't know about you, but I kind of enjoy not being Russian right now.


Socialism prevents recessions because the banks are REGULATED.

Also, Gorbachev would never have attacked because we already had enough to defeat the USSR. Reagan increased the military spending based on speculation of how many missiles the USSR. The USSR had fallen behind the Arms race even before Reagan entered office, but Reagan insisted that Congress spend more money on it.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

sorry for double post, but I was looking at some sites, and: shocking.

that's still the plan now.

thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

Also, Gorbachev would never have attacked because we already had enough to defeat the USSR. Reagan increased the military spending based on speculation of how many missiles the USSR. The USSR had fallen behind the Arms race even before Reagan entered office, but Reagan insisted that Congress spend more money on it.


Sure let's not take a potential military threat seriously. Because whenever that happens everything turns out alright
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Sure let's not take a potential military threat seriously. Because whenever that happens everything turns out alright


The USSR's missiles didn't match up to how many we had.
skarl
offline
skarl
250 posts
Nomad

did you know that many USSR missiles are lost? that means that some terrorist could find some of them... scary.

thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

The USSR's missiles didn't match up to how many we had.


Just because they didn't match up doesn't mean they weren't a threat. That's like saying, they're not a threat because they have 1 gun and I have 2.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Just because they didn't match up doesn't mean they weren't a threat. That's like saying, they're not a threat because they have 1 gun and I have 2.


What Reagan did was get 3 guns.
Showing 1-15 of 56