ForumsWEPRWorld War Simulations!

65 9593
RockLeo
offline
RockLeo
3 posts
Nomad

Even though war is bad, I love video games, strategy games involving it. So, what would be the most awesome faceoff in todays world, WorldWar III.
I think it would be an Alliance of China, Russia and India, versus an Alliance of European States, and US. that would be epic

  • 65 Replies
Efan
offline
Efan
3,086 posts
Nomad

that would be epic

That would be stupid, awful, horrendus, painful, bloody and it would destroy most of the world.
kingjac11
offline
kingjac11
2,597 posts
Nomad

So, what would be the most awesome faceoff in todays world, WorldWar III.


A war of flies and bees.Why would you even want to guess who will fight in world war III if there is one?
Somewhat49
offline
Somewhat49
1,606 posts
Nomad

I think WW3 would be quite dangerous. First of all, someone is gonna use atomics. When one does everyone looks over and sneaks there own into the equation.
Overal outcome: Dead habitat's.
Then there would also be people thinking "hey I played a video game like dis! Joining the war 'll be a peice o' cake!"
Overal outcome: Lotta dead gamers.
plus we got all these new technologies that would be not as bad as Manhatan Project but still be alot of work to clean up after.

PracticalManiac
offline
PracticalManiac
295 posts
Peasant

Oh man, Fallout 3 would become a reality. Atleast I would know how to survive in that.

Somewhat49
offline
Somewhat49
1,606 posts
Nomad

Oh man, Fallout 3 would become a reality. Atleast I would know how to survive in that.

Yea just keep blowing peoples pants off with bottlecap bombs. I don't think it will be like fallout cause the war might erupt too early to build a fallout shelter. Also there prolly wouldn't be as much guns and ammo lying carlessly around.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

We would lose anyway. China and India have the larger armies than the US and Europe. India has nukes, We don't have any.

We get nuked and our men get killed. We would lose.

Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

Then there would also be people thinking "hey I played a video game like dis! Joining the war 'll be a peice o' cake!"
Overal outcome: Lotta dead gamers.


Maybe you would, but all my friends wouldn't.
loloynage2
offline
loloynage2
4,206 posts
Peasant

I think it would be an Alliance of China, Russia and India,


Okay...that makes no sense? Why would Russia be with China? And why would India even take part in it? You obviously know nothing about politics. It would be something more like:

China and North Korea vs Russia, South Korea and Japan helped with America and Europe

that would be epic


No, no it wouldn't. Do you even know what war is? Playing Black ops does not count.
Wafflesquad
offline
Wafflesquad
170 posts
Peasant

WAR IS BAD. I think we all agree on that. And in case of a nuke apocalypse, here's what WOULDN'T happen:
-Zombies (Radiation usually causes death, not mutation)
-Rebuilding civilization (Most people wouldn't survive)
-People grab materials, make guns, and start shooting up the desert (Not enough materials left, you'd still have to eat, radiation would ravage the continent, causing poor soil quality and you couldn't grow stuff)
And, for good measure,
-ANYTHING that you see on TV or in video games or in movies.
The most likely result of any world war III is best summed up in a quote from Albert Einstein:

"I don't know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

We would lose anyway. China and India have the larger armies than the US and Europe. India has nukes, We don't have any.
We get nuked and our men get killed. We would lose.


...? The United States was the first to even have the bomb, or are you talking about a different country?
Dragonblaze052
offline
Dragonblaze052
26,677 posts
Peasant

India has nukes, We don't have any

What country are you from?

I think it would be an Alliance of China, Russia and India

At no point in time did those three ever have a connection.....


No, no it wouldn't. Do you even know what war is? Playing Black ops does not count.

Oh man, Fallout 3 would become a reality. Atleast I would know how to survive in that.

That would be stupid, awful, horrendus, painful, bloody and it would destroy most of the world

People, he is saying in a video game, what would be the best sides. Stop taking this seriously.


America and the EU have near about the best relations in the world these days, so we will almost definetly be allied.

The terrorist organizations in the middle East and most of Africa would take the opportunity to attempt a coup d' etat. South American Guerrilas will likely do the same.

Japanese/US relations have greatly improved in recent times with Japan becoming the largest producer of American culture (followed closely by idiots.....) They will likely be allied.

Russia/US relations never improved much since the cold war, they just stopped being hostile. Not likely allied.

North Korea will certainly be opposed to America and South Korea.

China would go with either side, depending on the events prior to the war.

Cuba is unlikely to side with America, but also has little reason to side against them. I don't know much about Raul Castro's political views.

Upper Africa (Egypt, Libya and the sorrounding nations) can't be determined yet.

Australia will probably be on America's side.


New Allies:
America
Japan
European Union
Australia
South Korea


New Axis:
North Korea
Russia
China
Cuba


Third Party Combatants (Not allied with eachother, but generally against the others. May side with NA/NX):
Irish Republican Army (IRA)
Alqida (likely misspelled)
Various terrorist/guerrila/revolutionary organizations.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

...? The United States was the first to even have the bomb, or are you talking about a different country?


The US doesn't have any nukes. Just because it was the first to have the atomic bomb, the hydrogen bomb, and the nuclear bomb, doesn't mean it still has those.
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

What country are you from?


How about you take the time to look at my profile?
Kevin4762
offline
Kevin4762
2,420 posts
Nomad

America
Japan
European Union
Australia
South Korea


No. If you mean America as in the US, then say the US. Japan has no military. The US' military is Japan's military. The EU doesn't have a military as a whole, but each independent nation. Australia has a very small military. South Korea is too weak to fight because North Korea will begin bombing immediately if they try to build up a military.

North Korea
Russia
China
Cuba


North Korea, fine. China, no. Why? It has no motive to do anything. Cuba has no army. It has cars from the '50s. Imagine its tanks. Russia is supposedly democratic so no. It may be corrupt, but not war thirsty.

If anything, the US and Britain vs. Pakistan and Afghanistan. However, since both of those have nukes, we prolly will never invade. The US would never have invaded Iraq if there were ACTUALLY WMDs.
thestuntman
offline
thestuntman
303 posts
Nomad

The US doesn't have any nukes.


Would you like to let me know how exactly you know this? I doubt you have full security clearance and you would be a fool to think that the government would tell us everything related to this subject. Even beyond that, though the United States ceased production of nuclear weapons, there are probably still some stockpiled.
Showing 1-15 of 65