A 92 year-old lady shot her neighbor's house. She shot 4 bullets into his house because he wouldn't kiss her. She appparently had a crush on him and threatened him multiple times when he refused. One of those was, of course, a threat to shoot his car.
you know you need to be in an old folks home when you start shooting at your neighbors because they dont want to kiss you becuase your old, smell like a perfume that was popular in 1949, probably extremly sinile, and hoard cats
"i have alsheimer's, but at least i don't have alsheimer's" i always think of that when i hear about this kind of stuff. That 92 year old lady probably has brain problems, i just assume that, since she's 92, she would probably be suffering from a brain disorder.
And I don't mean war. It was awful over there as far as guns go. In America, heck, I read multiple stories of people being shot everyday. No lie. I could show some the paper every freaking day. It's just too accepted.
Yes, I live in Indiana and if you read the newspaper you can find one or more of those stories every day.
"guns dont kill people, people kill people(and so do monkeys too if they have guns)."-the gun game
This is true, if some one wants some one dead, guns banned or not, they will kill them some how. No guns just eliminates one way of killing some one. Its not the guns fault, its the persons(or monkeys) fault. If a old lady shots some one, they shouldnt lock away all the guns, they should lock away that old lady.
Really? a gun ownership argument? of all the things this topic could have spiraled off into, like how freaking crazy that elder woman looked, it turned into a gun ownership argument.
ugh... anyway. This "gun banning" is a cheap and ineffective idea. The Second Amendment is in place because the Founding Fathers knew that in case of invasion, the people would be armed and the American people would be ready to fight for freedom and liberty.
America's government is set up so it never becomes obsolete. The laws and regulations of the nation can be changed constantly to fit the scenario of the world around the nation. If the government wishes not to initiate progress within the nation, then the people will be armed and ready to revolt and realign the nation on the path to success.
Now back on topic, did you see the bags on her? Bet her face is a 747's luggage storage!
I wouldn't be surprised if some teenager handed her the gun and asked her to it, I doubt if they expected her to do it at all.
why no one in her family has put her in a nursing home yet?
Perhaps she has no family that leave near her or maybe she refused to go into one, she'll probably be put into something like that after shooting someone.
ugh... anyway. This "gun banning" is a cheap and ineffective idea. The Second Amendment is in place because the Founding Fathers knew that in case of invasion, the people would be armed and the American people would be ready to fight for freedom and liberty.
Ridiculous. If you want to fight for your country join the army don't shut your doors and shoot to anyone that gets near to your house.
America's government is set up so it never becomes obsolete. The laws and regulations of the nation can be changed constantly to fit the scenario of the world around the nation. If the government wishes not to initiate progress within the nation, then the people will be armed and ready to revolt and realign the nation on the path to success.
This is stupid... Do you really need to make a revolution if the government isn't acting well? Can't you just vote for some other politician?
This is stupid... Do you really need to make a revolution if the government isn't acting well? Can't you just vote for some other politician?
If the government heads begin to act against the needs and wants of the nation in a severe enough matter to affect global policies, then yes, revolution will be necessary.
