during recess at school a kid walked up to the house and tried to pet a dog that had bitten a teacher before and the teacher supervising us yelled at him so 2 kids dragged the kid who was hated in the class and 1 ran off and 1 tried to push him in the yard the hated kid slapped the kid trying to push him in the yard and the kid trying to push the hated kid punched him and chased him off school grounds so do you think the kid who approached the dog should be held responsible?
Okay, it's a little confusing reading one ginormous sentence and trying to figure out what you're saying. If I'm right, you're saying that a kid went up to a house with a dog that bit a teacher, so a supervisor yelled at him. Then, when he was going back, two other kids tried forcing him into the yard with the dog so that he'd get in trouble. When he tried to stop them, he slapped them and they punched him and chased him off of the school grounds. I think (from what I've heard) that it's the people who tried to take him off school that are the troublemakers.
during recess at school kid 1 walked up to the house and tried to pet a dog that had bitten a teacher before and the teacher supervising us yelled at him so kids 2&3 dragged the kid 4 who was hated in the class and 2 ran off and 3 tried to push him in the yard kid 4 slapped kid 3 who was trying to push him in the yard and kid 3 punched kid 4 (for slapping him) and chased him off school grounds so do you think the kid 1 who approached the dog should be held responsible?
Kid 1 should not be held responsible for what kids 2, 3 and 4 did, kids 2 and 3 should be punished, and kid 4 should not be punished, since he hit in self-defense.
1 should only be in trouble at all if he left school and then only for that. 2 should be punished and 3 even more so. 4 should be in very little trouble.