The iPod touch has so much more functionality. The nano is just smaller which doesn't really help much. If i was running i would be using the shuffle so i never really have a use for a nano.
I have a shuffle for when I run, and it works fine, so yeah. Shuffle for running is the best because it's so tiny, obviously. New nano looks incredibly small for a touch screen, I don't know, I've never used it. iTouch seems fun, I would probably only get it for the games if I already didn't have a smart phone. Whoo, go Droid! ;D
I have to say Nano with this one because I only listen to music at night, and I don't need a touch because I can go on my DS, computer, Xbox or Wii for playing games.
Neither If I have to go with a Ipod, im going to get the Ipod 160 GB classic one. I could care less about some touch screen or something, I wan't music easy to listen to, not games and ****
Ipod: Internet, endless of apps, music, videos, photos and stuff like stocks, news, weather, notes and other **** nobody cares about. You can also download music and videos from Itunes I think. Wildly used by preepy 16 year old girls.
Nano:You play music and takes pictures for the newer version. That's preaty much it I guess (don't have a nano so wouldn't know other function). Wildly used by preepy 16 year old girls befor they got an Ipod.
Ipod nano is an Ipod. Also, everyone uses Itouch's not just 16 year old girls.
Trying to be funny (failed badly) and forgot to put touch for Ipod. And the "I think" was for the videos, not sure if you could download them from there. And the verdict for me is Touch>Nano
