Forums → Games → "Warfare" sequel?

Actually twice I said you DO have the right to post here, so...

I checked out your bio, are you really 15?

you're addicted to gaming!

Son, I've got a job, a family, great friends

If you really are 15 like your bio says, please don't use the term "the real world" until you are old enough to drive, vote, serve in the military, get married, rent a car, buy a house and have children.

Listen, I apologize that 5 pages ago I pissed you off. But you came across really condescending, and you don't talk to people like that unless you are prepared to deal with it coming back to you.

nobody here is impressed by your "Knowledge" of history

Only cynical nerds like you

And Mav, go get laid, you're too up tight dude

It makes you look like a ******.

They word they bleeped out rhymes with DOOOOOOSH

just stay on topic or you're done.

When I read your posts, all I can picture is Dwight Schrute from The Office madly pecking away at his keyboard. I wonder why...

we can all pretend Mav doesn't exist

I like how twice he staunchly demands that he has the right to post here

others are going to make fun of them for being so socially inept- because they deserve it

Mav should be ignored

But you came across really condescending

If you want YOUR ideas to be listened to, don't be argumentative

Please be polite to any others who post on this thread

Agism leglly only applies to discriminating against an elder. There is a solid argument to say that your youth and inexperience gives you a disadvantage. But you are too young to realize that. The same way that you think that freedom of speech applies to this thread. Armor games owns this thread and they could censor, delete or ban me, you or anyone and have the right to do so. You think you know what the terms you use mean, but you arent experienced enough to undertand them. One day you will look back and realize the folly of your ways. As for my manners, look at the reponses i posted to other ideas. Even if they seemed absurd, i repectfully thanked them but still pointed out the roadblock. Thats how adults treat people. You will learn that if you want to be gtruly repected b by adults, you have to be humble and respectful, or you will get insulted. And adults are alot better at that than you give us credit for. You seem to be a talented young man, but dont be fooled that the praise you reieve for your poetry on this site makes you an equal to an adult in experience and life. I wish you the best mav.

Both of you are off-subject. Why don't BOTH of you just go to the crhsitianity FTW thread if you wanna bash each-other. Jesus freakin' christ guys...... Anyway, I figured it out. The gameplay shouldn't be ballanced. it should be difficult, with the opponent having a distinct advantage, to give a more realistic challenge. Eh?

Thanks crazyape. The opponent should have an advantage, but if you do a multiplayer, each side would need to have advantages and disadvantages. I like 1944's approach to make some missions winable by advancing and others winable by holding the line for a time period. In the pacific theatre there was a period where the Japanese were advancing from island to island and the Americans were just trying to hold them off. As the war progressed the Americans started taking back those islands. So the game could have some missions as defensive and later ones offensive for the Yanks and vice versa for the Imperial Army.

Agism leglly only applies to discriminating against an elder.

Article Said:
The term has also been used to describe prejudice and discrimination against adolescents and children, including ignoring their ideas because they are too young, or assuming that they should behave in certain ways because of their age.

There is a solid argument to say that your youth and inexperience gives you a disadvantage. But you are too young to realize that.

The same way that you think that freedom of speech applies to this thread.

You think you know what the terms you use mean, but you arent experienced enough to undertand them.

As for my manners, look at the reponses i posted to other ideas.

Thats how adults treat people

You will learn that if you want to be gtruly repected b by adults, you have to be humble and respectful, or you will get insulted.

And adults are alot better at that than you give us credit for.

dont be fooled that the praise you reieve for your poetry on this site makes you an equal to an adult in experience and life.

I wish you the best mav.

The gameplay shouldn't be ballanced. it should be difficult, with the opponent having a distinct advantage, to give a more realistic challenge. Eh?

I like the handicap feature. How would it work in Multiplayer?

Perhaps the game could keep track of your wins/losses, and then automatically give you a handicap? Thats how it works in golf.

What's the reward for getting good at the game if you're handicapped for winning?

Perhaps everyone starts out with basic infantry. As you acquire xp in multiplayer games you get mortars, artillery, and snipers just like in single player mode are you you're not completing levels but you are gaining exp.

If you read the FAQ they say that they dont want to go over ww2 although it would be fun to play a civil war one they say they might be aimed to vietnam wich will be fun to B)

He said he might do a Civil War but no Vietnam or modern war. But that was 2 years ago. He might think different now. Or he may not do it at all. I wish there is some way to find out what his next project is.

I don't know... Con spent almost a year on TLS: UC

Was that in his faq? His blog? Twitter?

last year he worked on union city so thats were that time went, he might want to take some time off.