Actually i think everyone knows how the world was made since they teach it in science class to everyone because scientists DO know and have proved it. Especially considering we can observe worlds still being made right now.
I never said it was an accident; it is simply the nature and laws of things. And in the above quote i was referring to worlds; as that is what you said.
haha, so you actually believe that the life has been created by an accident?
Hehe, so you actually believe life was created on purpose? I don't think that I know of anything that could support a will behind all that. Scientists don't know for 100%, which is good because science is not a dogma; it is able to adapt to new results and evidence. But we do have clues and evidence with which we can safely say we are on the right track.
^ Quite true; there are several theories on how different worlds and stars were created that are all mostly right. But then there are all kinds of ways to make a tasty chicken now isn't there lol? So many things were created and happened for various reasons and life (on Earth) was simply something that grew from an infraction during all this creation. Not purpose, not accident. It just grew from the right conditions when they presented themselves.
in philosophy two things are wrong and are not acceptable: continuum & circle
circle is like this: the egg or the hen, which was first and continuum is like this: who created us? our parents. who created them? their parents. who created... (we can ask it endlessly)
the question is: who created god? an X created god ok then who created X? the X' created X ok then who created X'? the X" created X' and so on
this continuum is not possible there should be an end something who starts creating and who were not created so let's call that God
PS: for the answer to this question we need to know basics of logic and philosophy. for example we can't talk about integrals (in math) unless we know about functions
in philosophy two things are wrong and are not acceptable: continuum & circle circle is like this: the egg or the hen, which was first and continuum is like this: who created us? our parents. who created them? their parents. who created... (we can ask it endlessly) the question is: who created god? an X created god ok then who created X? the X' created X ok then who created X'? the X" created X' and so on this continuum is not possible there should be an end something who starts creating and who were not created so let's call that God PS: for the answer to this question we need to know basics of logic and philosophy. for example we can't talk about integrals (in math) unless we know about functions
This kinda makes sense. Eventually you keep asking the question where did this come from? And we either don't have an answer, say it was always there, or go back to the circle.
The Biblical answer is that nobody created God. He is by nature the eternal God. He was not created at all. He always was, is, and always will be. He did not work Himself up into a position to be God neither did He inherit the position from His parents, for He had no parentsâ�"no mother, no father. He has no beginning and will have no end. The fact that God is eternal is stressed in the Bible.
Although, I assume this may have been copied and pasted in someway, shape, or form, because of the way it looks, this is 100% and is stressed in the Bible with vivid detail. It seems the question was asked out of curiosity, but there are some who believe(and I assume) more in how scientific facts work more than knowing that God created everything and there was nobody before Him.
idk maybe albert einstein
Lol..Wow, really? It seems that you just chose the smartest person you can think of. Slick. Lol. If you were being sarcastic, I'll let you know of this: Sarcasm doesn't really translate well over the internet. Sorry.
If you'r a science-oriented person you probably would like to say that the Universe has been started with a "Big Boom"... well would you like to explain WHAT actually exploded and how that existed <before> the Universe?
No that's not what science says, it was an expansion of the universe.
Big Bang theory is just an another silly attempt of men to make things clear, though I think it's not a half-a-million percent possible. I'd say it's IMpossible. Not sure we even need this P:
Maybe you should learn what the theory actually states before calling it silly and impossible. Something your previous statement clearly hows you have a lacking of.
this continuum is not possible there should be an end something who starts creating and who were not created so let's call that God
Your statement is deceptive in that implies that something has to be a who. Since we can just as easily apply such qualities of beginning without God to something like energy there is no point in adding a god. If you want to just call that something god even though it lacks being a who defeating a basic definition of god, this would no better than me calling my screwdriver god.
Big Bang theory is just an another silly attempt of men to make things clear, though I think it's not a half-a-million percent possible. I'd say it's IMpossible. Not sure we even need this P:
You seem to be pretty certain of that. Why don't you try to study the big bang first? Maybe some of your questions would be explained in more details. If it's only a silly attempt to make things clear, why is it so complex and detailed? Why do people build materials that are worth hundreds of billion of dollars just to test out that "silly" theory? Why do scientists try so hard to find better and new ways of understanding it?
If it would be only a "silly" theory, they could just do something like religion.
"First there was energy, then BOOM! Universe created."
