ForumsWEPRWhy iran must not have nukes?

204 45890
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Title says it all.

  • 204 Replies
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

Title says it all.


^op spam. And as for why, it's bad for any country with an unstable government to have nuclear warheads.
partydevil
offline
partydevil
5,129 posts
Jester

they all should be destroyed in nuclear reactors. nothing against iran. only against the weapon. put a ban on it like there is a ban on cluster bombing dense populated areas.

zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

You need to put more in your OP otherwise this thread will get locked in an AG second.


The reason is because nukes are first of all very dangerous, and with an unstable theocratic regime like in Iran, they could be used for simply terrorist purposes. Another reason is one that people don't like to acknowledge, but nukes are a great deterrant from declaring war and stuff, and if Iran makes any more belligrant actions, than the US and Israel won't want their biggest enemy to have nuclear capabilities.

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

zakyman Will agree with your last point only

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

zakyman Will agree with your last point only


You can't disagree with facts. Iran's government is unstable, and it is theocratic. I'm not saying the two go hand in hand, and there are terrorists in Iran who would very much like to get their hands on nuclear weapons.
xNightwish
offline
xNightwish
1,608 posts
Nomad

I think it is because if Iraq would have Nukes they would gain in power. But as happened before there is the possibility that one madman takes over control of Iraq and if you give a lunatic a nuke it would be safe on earth.

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Iran government is unstable Care to give a source?

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

if you give a lunatic a nuke it would be safe on earth.

What if terry jones comes in oval office or someone else like him?
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

Quick google for a source, didn't read much so I don't know if it's entirely accurate. However, it's pretty universally agreed that Iran's government is not the shining tower of stability.

Source 1

Here's an interesting article I found about this too.

Iran:Nuclear Fears and Political Instability

xNightwish
offline
xNightwish
1,608 posts
Nomad

What if terry jones comes in oval office or someone else like him?

I'm not an American and I don't know much about Terry Jones, but I looked it up and I don't think he will make it (soon) to the oval office. But I don't see the problem to, the man is a comedian, actor etc. I think he will take a job as president seriously and not nuke random countries.
EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

What if terry jones comes in oval office or someone else like him?

He's from South Whales and due to the NBC clause of the constitution, he couldn't be president, but that's beside the point.
Reagan was an actor/commedian too and he did fine.
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Economic sanctions only destabilize a nation more and more.
BTW I think Iran made a mistake by announcing its intentions they should have done it like Pakistan It like every body knew that we are making nukes but their was no evidence.

thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

DUDES the Terry Jones

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

DUDES the Terry Jones

Ah. Thought you meant this guy for some reason. There's 8 noteworthy people with the same name. For the one you meant, why would people vote for him in a nation that boasts religious tolerance?
thepunisher93
offline
thepunisher93
1,826 posts
Nomad

Tell me then why would someone crazy will come to power in iran

Showing 1-15 of 204