ForumsWEPRThere is nothing wrong with Blasphemy - Discuss

16 6368
BritHennerz
offline
BritHennerz
408 posts
Farmer

I got this question for homework, I have already answered the question stating that Blasphemy is wrong and I just wondered what other people think.

  • 16 Replies
MattCox7
offline
MattCox7
30 posts
Nomad

Yes I agree, blasphemy is wrong. What class?

master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

It's only wrong in the eyes of religious people when religious people of their religion, who's religions tell them to not speak blasphemy about their god, speak blasphemy about their god. Nobody else cares about wether or not other religions do it or not, aside from extremists.

thebluerabbit
offline
thebluerabbit
5,340 posts
Farmer

no its not wrong. its part of what you believe is right and people should be able to talk about their opinions.

and its a pretty subjective matter since extremists can see pretty much everything as blasphemy. if we couldnt say anything about other religions/gods we probably just wouldnt talk to each other and i think thats worse

BritHennerz
offline
BritHennerz
408 posts
Farmer

Yeah but then there's nothing wrong with racism... and quite frankly there is a lot wrong with racism.

thebluerabbit
offline
thebluerabbit
5,340 posts
Farmer

Yeah but then there's nothing wrong with racism... and quite frankly there is a lot wrong with racism.


racism is saying something bad about what you are.

we are talking about saying something bad about what you believe in. and that happens even without religion
dair5
offline
dair5
3,371 posts
Shepherd

There is nothing wrong with Blasphemy. It doesn't hurt anyone and people should have the right to say and think what they want. If a religious person can say I think you're going to hell. Then someone not of their religion should be allowed to say, I think thats stupid.

Yeah but then there's nothing wrong with racism... and quite frankly there is a lot wrong with racism.


Racism, and Blasphemy arn't the same thing.
Avorne
offline
Avorne
3,085 posts
Nomad

Skin colour is a fact of someone's biology - you're born with it and, unless you tan or bleach your skin or something, you can't change it. Religion, however, and religious beliefs - they're more 'add-in' characteristics. They're something that people choose and can change - blasphemy is merely akin to saying something that offends hipsters or vegetarians and nothing like making fun of someone because of the colour of their skin.

NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

Hold on, what do you mean by blasphemy?

You can't compare blasphemy and racism because racism is a form of discrimination, whereas blasphemy is not.

invalid777
offline
invalid777
2,074 posts
Nomad

Maybe you should remind people that you shouldn't use religion as an "excuse".

Well anyway, it will depend. If you believe in God, then obviously blasphemy would be a sin. If you were non religious or athiest, then most likely it wouldn't be bad.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

because racism is a form of discrimination, whereas blasphemy is not.

Could it be considered religious intolerence?
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Blasphemy (from websters online)
1 a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity

2: irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable

I find 1b particularly interesting when put up against the concept of being made in God's image.

Bladerunner679
offline
Bladerunner679
2,487 posts
Blacksmith

Blasphemy, the fabric of heresy, and the seed of religious divergence.

it is an interesting concept from a logical standpoint. every religion claims blasphemy is wrong, but few people seem to remember the fact that blasphemy was what started their religion in the first place. if it wasn't for such a concept, many of the worlds most popular religions today would never exist.

it's even more ironic that religions that were based off blasphemy says it's wrong to do so.

as far as i'm concerned, blasphemy could provide a fresh prospective to something old and outdated. the blasphemy will do one of three things:

1.die off before anything happens.
2.Update the religion to accomodate the blasphemer.
3.create a new religion similar to the one it came from, except for the beliefs that the blasphemer didn't approve.

there is my analysis. feel free to oppose.

-Blade

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,991 posts
Grand Duke

as far as i'm concerned, blasphemy could provide a fresh prospective to something old and outdated. the blasphemy will do one of three things:


Just like how the Protestant branches of Christianity popped up during the Reformation as blasphemers.
CabzIndustries
offline
CabzIndustries
35 posts
Nomad

Could it be considered religious intolerence?


Does it have to be religious, cant it be blasphemous to insult a honored king?
Bladerunner679
offline
Bladerunner679
2,487 posts
Blacksmith

Does it have to be religious, cant it be blasphemous to insult a honored king?


blasphemy is really more along the lines of religion, because it shows you oppposing certain bits of doctrine that others deem important.

In a way, you could call it blasphemy, but I don't think I would necessarily call it that.

quick question, when the insult was made, was the king alive or dead?

alive-the guy who insulted the king is just being an A-hole
Dead-that's when it could be considered blasphemy.

-Blade
Showing 1-15 of 16