And in either case, the statement is as ridiculous from any angle. Osama sneaking into the States? Osama being funded by the American government? Osama in a military base when he has been one of the most wanted men for a decade?
Anyway. We either have him in prison or he is still running in the caves
Proof?
To all you out there who claim he's alive, I hate to break it to you, but he is most certainly dead. Simply because the government buried him at sea does not make his death or reports of his death any less valid. Would it back up the argument if photos were released? Yes, but even the freaking Taliban admitted he was dead.
the government lie people lie. One lie changes the world. And this is one. Why do you think Obama wanted to close the Bay. Osama is living with G.W. Bush. Top secret info shhhhhhh
the government lie people lie. One lie changes the world. And this is one. Why do you think Obama wanted to close the Bay. Osama is living with G.W. Bush. Top secret info shhhhhhh
okay, now I know you're crazy. the government lying and the people lying are true, but the simple fact is that bin laden attacked during bush's term, and bush had basically spent his entire career routing out al-quaeda. why would you possibly think that bush and bin-laden would ever be friends, let alone live together?
Umm Bush need a towel and bin laden gave him his. Did we notland on the moon. Do pigs fly Did the gov't not cover up the rosewell incident Was Jfk assinated If you answer yes to all above you have been brianwashed by the govt
1. we landed on the moon 2.pigs don't fly. science proves that, and the government isn't doing anything about pigs. 3.roswell is all speculation these days. at this point I've stoped bothering about it. 4.he was. there's footage to prove it.
now, please stop talking, we know that you are a nutcase, and nobody is going to listen to you anymore.
now, please stop talking, we know that you are a nutcase, and nobody is going to listen to you anymore.
First off im not nuts. u are just disillusionate to truth. its a good point. Its hard to type the reasons why because it is mostly a debate that you have to research think about and be able to defend. its hard on a computer. but review the facts with the mind set that he is not dead and you see a different side of the fence
but review the facts with the mind set that he is not dead
why deny the fact that he's dead? (or any of the other crazy stuff that seems to happen in your head) you set your view on the matter and then you try to find evidence for this view. it's the same as what religions do whit their books. and thats why religions fail and so do you fail.
First off im not nuts. u are just disillusionate to truth. its a good point. Its hard to type the reasons why because it is mostly a debate that you have to research think about and be able to defend. its hard on a computer. but review the facts with the mind set that he is not dead and you see a different side of the fence
your argument only works if you are assuming he is still alive. assumptions are never what you should base your argument on. because of this fact, your entire argument is a house of cards, very fragile, and easy to destroy.
also, if he is alive, show me actual proof. if I am as you claim "ignorant of the truth", then prove it. don't make baseless claims, because those have as much weight as those assumptions you used to build your argument.
i am using logic. To understand my point look at it different. It was like taking candy from a baby.
We could not find 100,000 men in a jungle. How the hell do we find one man in a desert. The facts added up to a believable story but you cant trust facts. Like you said with religion its based on truth and nobody will ever know the truth so if you want to call me a disillusional ******* go right ahead. When the truth surfaces we will know the real facts . Until then stfu and lets f****** debate this like gentlemen.
i am using logic. To understand my point look at it different. It was like taking candy from a baby.
Yes it was. You can't even form a coherent sentence, how could we not win?
We could not find 100,000 men in a jungle.
Yes we did. We killed most of them, and when we couldn't find them we burned down the jungle. Not to mention that was many years ago...
How the hell do we find one man in a desert.
This is a desert:
Not a lot of places to hide. Especially not up against a military power with some of the civilians on their side. Really, your only choices of where to hide in a desert are underground (Husein tried that, we found him) or in a bunker (Osama tried this. We got him). Where would you hide in a desert?
The facts added up to a believable story but you cant trust facts
....Why not?
Have lizardmen infiltrated the government again? I am sure the Illuminati will release bigfoot on them again, don't worry.
Like you said with religion its based on truth and nobody will ever know the truth so if you want to call me a disillusional ******* go right ahead.
...Who said that?
When the truth surfaces we will know the real facts . Until then stfu and lets f****** debate this like gentlemen.
We do know the real facts. America says he was dead. The terrorist said he was dead. Everyone knows he is dead. There is really no reason to think he is alive.
i am using logic. To understand my point look at it different. It was like taking candy from a baby.
do you even know what logic is? this is a serious question, not intended to be an insult whatsoever.
We could not find 100,000 men in a jungle. How the hell do we find one man in a desert.
you can hide easily in a jungle, but you can't hide easily in a desert. simple enough.
The facts added up to a believable story but you cant trust facts.
very little of what you have presented is actual fact. the rest is blind speculation, and outbursts of anger due to the fact that we think you are higher than a kite right now.
Like you said with religion its based on truth and nobody will ever know the truth
when did I say this? I'm an atheist, I would never say such an absurd thing.
if you want to call me a disillusional ******* go right ahead.
don't need to, you just called yourself one, but I will still think your argument is teunous, and your credibility nonexistient.
When the truth surfaces we will know the real facts .
we already do, but you're too blind to see them.
Until then stfu and lets f****** debate this like gentlemen.
you are the only person on this thread who isn't acting like a gentleman. I've been trying to keep it as civil as possible, while you're the one who is cursing me off and probably giving me the finger in front of your monitor.