The reason for this is because without an opposite, it simply can't exist. For something to exist, it needs an opposite. I know this because of the above mentioned reasons.
Then should I raise that for each person I love shall be a person I hate? Because that doesn't add up.
There need not be a balance -- however, it certainly helps to have negativity be more 'welcome', for some people.
For the world to be a perfect one, the negativity would need to stem from the idea of wanting progress -- and the negativity will serve as a motivation for the people to do what they can to approach that goal.
Where frivolous arguments will decay to a solid debate with base elements of the subject being apparently known, people using logic at their finest and morality at the apex of values for both parties.
Preferably, there wouldn't be much "active" negativity - people wouldn't take actions influenced by their anger, aside from trying to resolve the issue of what is angering them in the best way they can (i.e Punching a wall is not going to help you achieve that). It would be the views of the people that are negative, not the emotions that they're with, because I would hope this stands to truth in an ideal world:
"Honor virutis preamium" (Honour be the reward of virtue)
Do you just have a grudge against all people who actually believe in something?
Yeah, except I'll only present it when appropriate -- this counts as appropriate.
First off, I love how y'all turn this into a religious thing.
If this is a diatribe, should I just stop reading? There are legitimate points to note on religion when trying to state a perfect world, no?
It has nothing to do with religion.
Oh, it's a horrendously ignorant statement instead. If you're going to point the issue towards us "irresponsible humans", then that's even worse.
Heaven is a completely different set of parameters. Why? Because this world is a human- centered world. Heaven is a God- centered world.
Oh, you went there. /facedesk
You know that perfect idea of people using logic at their finest? Please try and do the same because -- for a fact -- you cannot prove that Heaven is even real, nevermind what it is centered on (that and Earth being human-centered? What?).
Yes, this is a religious thing, because religion has influenced countless people and a lot of it not even for the better.
Not all of it is the peoples' fault either -- it was indoctrination based on a firm set of beliefs based on absolute FAITH. Of course, some person came up with it because (likely explanation) it explained some things that they couldn't at the time (or, it was a book to provide a set of morals for people).
Does that mean they're right in believing it? No. It means that when they were not surrounded by the facts we know with the evidence supporting it they had nothing else to go to. It was illogical to deter from the path they chose because no one else did, either.
you wouldn't be able to comprehend the emotion or mental state.
I'm quite sure that people can just do so naturally. It's not really a "thing-with-a-soul" or "human" characteristic -- emotions are like instincts, which is why strong emotions can make it more difficult to control one self. It's innate, and natural.
At least, that would make sense. Of course, neither of us have the proof to back this up and probably never will because all people have suffered to some degree (any we could find, probably).
Also, if you've already experienced anger and thus gained an idea of joy -- why would you ever need to be angry again? You wouldn't be, willingly.
- H
