Because I live in an area that has really bad internet connection, I often die before I see the guys who shoot me come round the corner.
I like the fast pace game play of COD but I don't think there're is enough variety and the guys who choose the most over powered guns always win. It's all spraying and praying, sound whoring but other games like Battle Field, you have to be accurate and use burst fire.
As for the OP, that isn't a problem of CoD, but your bad internet connection. Now, unless the second and third thing you mentioned was "the problem", then there's not much else to say.
It's all spraying and praying, sound whoring but other games like Battle Field, you have to be accurate and use burst fire.
You need to use less burst fire in Battlefield 3 in Bad Company 2. And CoD is more about accuracy -- but it's so easy to do it's not worth mentioning. Unless you're talking about longer distance warfare on Battlefield 3 then it requires probably less accuracy, purely because of all other elements involved, such as: Healing; Ammo replenishing; Reviving; Suppressive Fire and, Vehicles.
People who choose the most overpowered guns always win? Well congratulations, you've met at least decently-minded people in CoD, if they always win that means they can aim even a little and if they use overpowered weapons they're using what's in the game and in their disposal to win.
You're complaining about the entire formula of the most successful franchise in the gaming industry. You can't apply changes to it to make it good, or that much better, without almost reformatting the entire thing.
Suggestions have always been from me for customers to buck their game up and be more selective. Buy what they think is good and seek the most enjoyable gameplay experience from all of them before making another purchase (not entirely necessary but economically beneficial for the customer if that is a situation).
I would have to disagree with you there, the maps on MW3 are so small people don't even have to look through the sight and during long range fire fights they just hold down the trigger and spin the analogue stick in circles.
the maps on MW3 are so small people don't even have to look through the sight
Meanwhile a decent player would be jumping as he shoots, in which he needs to adjust as he travels automatically.
and during long range fire fights they just hold down the trigger and spin the analogue stick in circles.
If you're going to make a point, exaggeration isn't going to help you.
Disagree all you please, but BF3 due to the other ways you can play the game (which are required to be efficient) and the suppression system mean a whole other story.
The problem with CoD. Excepts from,it's existence, it's cry for money. If u buy that game u have paid for 50% because there will be map packs which u need to buy.
The problem with CoD. Excepts from,it's existence, it's cry for money. If u buy that game u have paid for 50% because there will be map packs which u need to buy.
yeah that is true, i mean why not just give you more content to begin with or more stuff with the DLC's since they're making so much money, although my brother was on the black ops 2 forums and someone said that they're either will or might be map editing, now of course that is just what one person said and it's not like it was on charlie intel or anything but that would be kinda cool if they had map editing at least if it's not exclusive to the computer
I would have to disagree with you there, the maps on MW3 are so small people don't even have to look through the sight and during long range fire fights they just hold down the trigger and spin the analogue stick in circles.
really? aiming is nothing? well if you think that, maybe thats why you are complaning. aiming is everything. sure, maybe you can get lucky and get a kill or two, but if you dont aim (and i mean not use the crosshairs) well then you cant kill. if you cant kill you die. if you die, you blame it on lag. if you blame it on lag its some how is CoDs fault. if its CoDs fault then we have to hear you complain on a forum. if you complain on a forum then you get gammers mad. dont get gammers mad, aim down your sights. like the direct tv referance?
really? aiming is nothing? well if you think that, maybe thats why you are complaning. aiming is everything. sure, maybe you can get lucky and get a kill or two, but if you dont aim (and i mean not use the crosshairs) well then you cant kill. if you cant kill you die. if you die, you blame it on lag. if you blame it on lag its some how is CoDs fault. if its CoDs fault then we have to hear you complain on a forum. if you complain on a forum then you get gammers mad. dont get gammers mad, aim down your sights. like the direct tv referance?
I'm not sure if you are aiming this at me but just to clarify I do aim down sights and just wanted to say I am surprised at the amount of people who don't.
What COD is about to me: Fun. To jump and throw random throwing knives, to get MOAB's in infected, to quickscope/noscope with friends, or even just play normally. In COD you do just about anything, and it's really fun. BF3 is also an enjoyable game. Different graphics, game mechanics, equipment, etc. It's all about fun. If I don't have fun, I don't like the game. And I don't care if it's not realistic, IT'S STILL FUN T_T
