|
Posted Oct 27, '12 at 10:01am

zonic98
453 posts
|
I have nothing against signatures, just don't let them to be too big-sized.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 27, '12 at 12:42pm

Jacen96
1,200 posts
|
have the admins make a little thing where you would set your signature say
Set your signature, the window will be no bigger than x by y, any thing bigger will require scrolling to view.
and below have a check-box to turn on/off signatures.
~~~Darth Caedus
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 27, '12 at 3:10pm

GhostOfMatrix
10,764 posts
|
If they decide to add signatures it should strictly be text, same size as regular text, and a short limit. Just enough to include what you want, not something that takes up a large amount of the page.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 27, '12 at 11:36pm

nichodemus
10,588 posts
|
No why should it just be regular text? As Jacen pointed out, making all sigs fit into a certain resolution and giving it a scroll function can solve such problems.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 10:13am

GhostOfMatrix
10,764 posts
|
The forum wouldn't be aesthetic anymore. The last thing we need is large text after each post. Regular text is also noticeable as a signature, we don't need anything fancy.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 10:44am

nichodemus
10,588 posts
|
Aesthetics don't have a clear definition, the field is nebulous and contentious. As it is, many would argue that the white based forums we have are too clinical and too monotonous.
As for large fancy pictures/doodles/texts clogging up the thread, again I beg to differ. As Jacen has stated this size is limited to a certain resolution, presumably not too large to disorientate people. From perusing multiple forums and using them for ages, no, signatures do not cause disorganization and confusion given their predetermined sizes which have worked pretty well.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 10:56am

GhostOfMatrix
10,764 posts
|
Why is a signature feature wanted? You are already capable of including signatures on your posts/comments as is, some users even do.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 11:22am

Patrick2011
2,901 posts
|
Why is a signature feature wanted? You are already capable of including signatures on your posts/comments as is, some users even do.
It's less work to create the signature once than for every post.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 11:29am

GhostOfMatrix
10,764 posts
|
A simple solution is to keep the signature saved in notepad then paste it at the end of your posts. All a signature feature will do is save ten seconds of your time, hardly worth implementing.
|
| |
|
Posted Oct 28, '12 at 12:35pm

nichodemus
10,588 posts
|
More then ten seconds. It allows you to customize your font, size, colour, text effects without having to code it for yourself. It saves a huge amount of time. Currently, it requires one to constantly remember to copy and paste, or edit painstakingly, especially for new comers.
|
| |