Forums

ForumsWorld Events, Politics, Religion, Etc.

What would be the best way to unpopulate the earth

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 8:22am

darkblueoc

darkblueoc

36 posts

On a different fourm website, one person asked if homosexuality was evolution's way of decreasing the population...what are your guy's thoughts on it?

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 8:54am

partydevil

partydevil

5,087 posts

On a different fourm website, one person asked if homosexuality was evolution's way of decreasing the population...what are your guy's thoughts on it?

it would be doing a poor job.
but on a serious note. i can only laugh at the idea.

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 10:09am

HahiHa

HahiHa

4,942 posts

Knight

On a different fourm website, one person asked if homosexuality was evolution's way of decreasing the population...what are your guy's thoughts on it?

There are a few things not working with that notion...

Evolution is not a planned process. Something doesn't happen in order to attain a certain state.

If homosexuality would be evolving, that would mean there's a selective pressure towards it. Problem is, the genealogic line ends at homosexual individuals (they don't produce offsprings), so any genetic influence cannot be the case (and I'm assuming here their influence on the survival of family members is low; furthermore family members might not even carry any relevant genes).

But anyway, homosexuality has always been around, not only in humans but also in many animal species. And yet we grow and grow. So as partydevil said, it would be doing a poor job :P

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 11:18am

partydevil

partydevil

5,087 posts

i was think a bit. and i was wondering if others could find a other solution for this hypothetical question.

if i was evolution itself (or the god that controls it. w/e you want) and i wanted and could make a choice of how i wanted the human population to decrease. then what would i change to make that happen?

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 3:23pm

MageGrayWolf

MageGrayWolf

9,667 posts

Knight

On a different fourm website, one person asked if homosexuality was evolution's way of decreasing the population...what are your guy's thoughts on it?

Homosexuality doesn't equate to infertility. Though even if we do say that homosexuals just don't reproduce this could still be a net benefit to increase the populations as we know have members of the group capable of providing needed services for those who are reproducing. Such as functioning as surrogate care givers to the offspring due to the parent not being around, either temporarily or permanently.

 

Posted Jul 3, '13 at 4:12pm

Wyrzen

Wyrzen

325 posts

Best way to depopulate would be to reintroduce smallpox.

Humane? Not at all.

A thought? Yes it is.

 

Posted Jul 20, '13 at 3:53am

McSwagga

McSwagga

51 posts

make a bad infection that turns people to zombies and they will do the rest

 

Posted Aug 17, '13 at 10:10am

LazyOne

LazyOne

140 posts

Best way to depopulate would be to reintroduce smallpox.

Humane? Not at all.

A thought? Yes it is.

I think you need to look up the definition of "best".

I hate threads with 1 sentence OPs who leave the reader to figure the real topic out. There are multiple scenarios where depopulation is necessary.

1) Third world countries where people lead a short life of famine and suffering.
My suggestion: an extremely large portion of the money raised by charity doesn't reach the target audience. Some goes to transport, but most of it goes to "gifts" to already wealthy people who have power in the country. Try to improve that first. You could then offer help in exchange for a sterilisation of the woman.

2) First world countries where the economy suffers because people keep growing older. Older people = more money goes to retirements. Also, the population stagnates so basically you have less working people to generate money for more elderly people who use money.
My suggestion: raise retirement age.

A depopulation is not always the solution.

 

Posted Aug 18, '13 at 11:13am

partydevil

partydevil

5,087 posts

raise retirement age.

it works to a certain amount. at some point the elderly people will keep the jobs that are needed for younger people to give their working life a start.
if you want to raise retirement age then you will need to the jobs for it. if not then it wont work.

also is this not depopulating... in the case of to much elderly people i would say to just give less medical support. dont give a 89 year old a new hip or dont put people on emergency life support anymore after they are 75/80 for example. people get older because we keep them alive. just let them die, it's natural..

offer help in exchange for a sterilisation of the woman.

"hey, you. sterilize yourself, then we will help you."
i dont think many people want your help. and it certainly isn't going to help emancipation.

 

Posted Aug 18, '13 at 11:46am

LazyOne

LazyOne

140 posts

dont give a 89 year old a new hip or dont put people on emergency life support anymore after they are 75/80 for example. people get older because we keep them alive. just let them die, it's natural..

What the hell?

"Hi, I'm 89, I need medical support."
-"Heyyy, pal! I'm a doctor! Sorry, the law forbids me from helping you since you  are older than 75. Even though you have worked and paid taxes for the majority of your time on earth, you don't deserve help because you're too old! Have fun!"

"hey, you. sterilize yourself, then we will help you."
i dont think many people want your help. and it certainly isn't going to help emancipat

First of all I don't see how sterilisation could negatively affect emancipation and sterilisation. I thought anticonception was an accomplishment of emancipation?

Second, believe me, when people are in need for medical help/food/water/shelter, they'll be more than happy to give up their fertility for that.

 
Reply to What would be the best way to unpopulate the earth

You must be logged in to post a reply!