I don't know how I can spell this out for you anymore, Drace. I mean the speices which totals as the "best", when the abilities of every race are added and compared.
I quite agree with what Xzeno said:
Humans may rule the world, but nothing does the job of being a fox better then a fox.
I don't know how I can spell this out for you anymore, Drace. I mean the speices which totals as the "best", when the abilities of every race are added and compared.
Well then I don't see we are arguing volcano. Compare the animal kingdom to our kingdom.
Well I think if you mean that then everyone knows the answer is clearly a tiger. Tigers can: 1 Be silent 2 Kill instantly 3 Look awesome 4 Swim up to a mile in choppy water 5 Breath fire 6 shoot lasers 7 Fly All are true up to # 5
The most superior form of life is nothing everything has pros and cons ours is intellect others are strength, speed(cheetah), camo(Chameleon), defense(porcupine). etc.
Nonetheless, Drace is right to have an issue with defining the measure- since even if we could go so far as to claim that attributes are quantifiable, this value cannot hold across all environments.
For example, a crab may be resistant to hard attacks thanks to its shell, but an octopus, lacking all these things, can squeeze itself through tiny spaces with impunity.
